NCT01952873Not yet recruiting
Rapid Inflation/Deflation Compared With Prolonged High-Pressure Balloon Inflation
Rapid Inflation/Deflation Compared With Prolonged High-Pressure Balloon Inflation on the Results of Stent Deployment
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 21 Oct 2026
Brief summary (registry, in English)
It is universally accepted that high-pressure balloon inflation is required to most effectively deploy a coronary balloon-expandable stent. However, there is not consensus nor are there any guidelines regarding the method of balloon inflation, particularly the duration of inflation. Underexpansion and strut malapposition after stent deployment are among the most powerful predictors for adverse vessel outcomes. High-pressure inflation for stent deployment is effective to optimally expand the stent, but unlike in vitro testing in air, there are poorly distensible plaque elements that may not instantaneously yield to the balloon pressure. However, these elements may ultimately yield to prolonged inflation. Most clinical interventional cardiologists inflate for a relatively short period (15-30 sec). The investigators have noted that when balloon pressure is maintained at a certain pressure level it tends to decrease over time, and may require 60-180 or more seconds to maintain pressure stability. This finding implies that plaque elements are yielding slowly over time to the increased pressure, thus increasing expansion, and suggests that a prolonged inflation until balloon pressure stabilizes is more effective than a rapid inflation/deflation sequence to fully expand and appose the stent to the vessel wall. At present there is no consensus on stent deployment strategy. It is our hypothesis that prolonged inflation is superior to the more commonly used strategy of rapid inflation/deflation. Optimal coherence tomography (OCT), a novel technology that measures near-infrared light reflections and translates them into a 2D image, has an axial resolution nearly 10-times that of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Thus it is possible to examine the extent of stent malposition and stent expansion using this modality. The current randomized trial tests the hypothesis that prolonged balloon inflation until a stable balloon pressure is maintained is more effective than a rapid inflation/deflation sequence when performed to the same balloon inflation pressure.
- Status (registry)
- Not yet recruiting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- First submitted
- 18 Sept 2013
- Start date
- Jan 2027
- Primary completion date
- Dec 2028
- Lead sponsor
- Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
- Diseases
- Coronary artery disease
- NCT number
- NCT01952873
What you commit to
- Study type: Interventional
- Planned participants: 40
- From Jan 2027 to the primary completion date, Dec 2028
- 1 site in 1 country
- Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them
Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.
Who cannot take part
Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.
Lab values
- 1\. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction 2. Chronic total occlusion 3. Bifurcation lesion or major side branch (\>2.5 mm) within the stented area 4. Need for overlapping stents 5. Clinical instability including cardiogenic shock 6. Inability to give informed consent 7. Chronic kidney disease with serum creatinine \>1.8 mg/dL 8. Unprotected left main stenosis
Other
- \-
Who the study is looking for
- Patients \>18 years old with coronary disease with clinical indication for single stent placement in a lesion with a 2.5-3.5 mm diameter and who require OCT for determination of effective stent placement .
Age in the registry: 19 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers
Sites (1)
Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.
| Site | City | Country | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|
| John L McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status | Little Rock | United States | Unknown status |
This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.