Fact CheckerSign in

NCT03654131Active, not recruitingPhase 2

Microwave Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Oligometastatic Disease: a Prospective, Randomised, Phase 2 Trial

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy vs. Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Metastatic Disease in the Liver - a Randomized Phase II Trail

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 19 Mar 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

The LAVA-CRLM trial (Local Ablation Versus Ablative radiotherapy in ColoRectal Liver Metastases) is a prospective, randomised, phase 2 study designed to compare local control and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)in patients with colorectal liver metastases and oligometastatic disease. Primary endpoint is freedom form local lesion progression.

Status (registry)
Active, not recruiting
Phase (registry)
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100 (actual)
First submitted
27 Aug 2018
Start date
25 Jul 2018
Primary completion date
1 Jan 2026
Lead sponsor
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
NCT number
NCT03654131

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional · Phase 2
  • Participants enrolled: 100
  • From 25 Jul 2018 to the primary completion date, 1 Jan 2026
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Previous radiotherapy to the liver

Other illness

  • Another active cancer disease within the past 36 months

Other

  • Liver volume \< 700 ml
  • Not able to understand written or oral protocol information

Who the study is looking for

  • Colorectal cancer patients with oligo metastatic disease in the liver (1 to 3 tumors), and where metastases are found unsuitable for resection because of
    • non-resectability
    • small metastasis localized deep in the liver, where a parenchyma sparing intervention is preferred over an extensive resection
    • previous extensive liver surgery
    • comorbidity
  • The multidisciplinary team should all agree that both percutaneous or open surgical MW-ablation and SBRT are safe as first treatment choice for the individual patient.
  • Tumor sizes ≤4.0 cm
  • Age \> 18 years
  • Signed informed consent

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Righospitalet
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
CopenhagenDenmarkUnknown status

Related publications

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.