Sign in

NCT04695210Completed

Virtual Peer-to-peer Support Programme for Carers of MND

A Virtual Peer-to-peer Support Programme for Family Caregivers of Individuals With Motor Neurone Disease at Risk of Becoming or Currently Technology-dependent: Randomised Controlled Trial

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 1 Jun 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Background/scope There is growing recognition that family caregiving is a serious public health issue requiring supportive interventions. Family caregivers play an essential role in sustaining a stable environment enabling individuals with motor neurone disease (MND) that are technology dependent to live at home. The family caregivers can experi¬ence exceptional burden and significant decline in psychological wellbeing due to MND's rapid and pro¬gressive nature with profoundly debilitating effects and intensive support needs. Dependence on assistive technology adds an additional level of complexity to family caregiving due to the need to learn how to operate and troubleshoot medical devices, train other caregivers, and negotiate appointments with new specialties within the healthcare system. Despite the recognized impact of caregiving for individuals with MND, data are scarce as to effective interventions that provide direct practical and psychosocial supports. Difficulty accessing support may increase psychological distress. As the burden of caring increases due to disease progression and increasing technology dependence, access to existing informal support networks may diminish. Online peer support using virtual modalities is a flexible and low cost form of support. Peers, people who have experienced the same health problem and have similar characteristics as support recipients, can be a key source of emotional, informational, and affirmational support. Peer support improves psychological well-being of caregivers of people with conditions such as dementia, cancer, and brain injury. Although peer support programmes for family caregivers of people with MND exist, data as to their efficacy are limited. Therefore, we have developed an online peer support programme, completed beta and usability testing and now propose to test the effect on caregiver psychological wellbeing and caregiver burden. Aim/research question(s) Overall aim: to determine the efficacy of a 12-week online peer support programme on family caregiver psychological health and caregiver burden. Primary research question: What is the effect of the online peer support programme on psychological distress measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)? Secondary research questions: 1. What is the effect on positive affect, caregiver burden, caregiving mastery, caregiving personal gain, and coping? 2. How do participants use the programme (fidelity and reach)? 3. What is the perceived usability and acceptability? Methods The investigators will conduct a parallel group randomised controlled trial with participants allocated to 12-week access to the online peer support programme or a usual care control group. The investigators will enrol family caregivers of an individual with MND who is referred for consideration or receiving any of the following 1. assisted ventilation 2. cough assist 3. gastroscopy and enteral feeding i.e., entering King's clinical staging Stage 4A: nutritional support; or Stage 4B: respiratory support \[51\]: The 12-week peer-to-peer support programme entails: 1. audio, video, or text private messaging; 2. synchronous weekly chat; 3. asynchronous discussion forum; and 4. informational resources. The investigators will collect demographic and caregiving data including the Caregiver Assistance Scale and Caregiving Impact Scale, and caregiver measures (HADS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Zarit Burden Interview, Pearlin Mastery Scale, Personal Gain Scale, Brief COPE) at baseline and programme completion. The investigators will download use of online peer support programme features, assess usability, and conduct semi-structured interviews to explore acceptability using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. To test for a medium size effect (d=0.5), at 5% level of significance (2-sided) with power 80%, 64 participants are required in each arm (128 total). Adjusting for 20% attrition requires 154 participants. Proposed findings The proposed study will demonstrate the effect of a online peer support programme on psychological distress, positive affect, caregiving burden, mastery, personal gain and coping. Data on programme fidelity will enable the investigators to objectively assess acceptability and interpret study results. Data on usability and acceptability will inform future scalability of the online peer support programme outside of the trial both nationally and internationally, and to other family caregiver populations.

Status (registry)
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
149 (actual)
First submitted
19 Dec 2020
Start date
7 Jun 2022
Primary completion date
31 May 2025
Lead sponsor
King's College London
NCT number
NCT04695210

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Participants enrolled: 149
  • From 7 Jun 2022 to the primary completion date, 31 May 2025
  • 25 sites in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • 1\. Actively receiving psychiatric/psychologist care identified through self-report.

Who the study is looking for

  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • family/informal caregiver of an individual with MND living at home who is referred for consideration or receiving any of the following i.e., entering King's clinical staging Stage 4A: nutritional support; or Stage 4B: respiratory support \[51\]:
    • assisted ventilation
    • cough assist
    • gastroscopy and enteral feeding
  • able to speak/read English;
  • has access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone and the internet (we have the ability to provide loan 4G enabled tablets if required); and
  • consents to participation

Age in the registry: 18 years to 100 years · Sex: All · Accepts healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (25)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
BedfordUnited KingdomUnknown status
Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
BradfordUnited KingdomUnknown status
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
BrightonUnited KingdomUnknown status
Pilgrims Hospice
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
CanterburyUnited KingdomUnknown status
Coventry Community Specialist Palliative Care Team
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
CoventryUnited KingdomUnknown status
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
CoventryUnited KingdomUnknown status
Ninewells Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
DundeeUnited KingdomUnknown status
Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
ExeterUnited KingdomUnknown status
Phyllis Tuckwell Hospice
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
FarnhamUnited KingdomUnknown status
Medway Community Healthcare
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
GillinghamUnited KingdomUnknown status
Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Kingston upon ThamesUnited KingdomUnknown status
The Leicestershire & Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering - LOROS
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
LeicesterUnited KingdomUnknown status
The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
LiverpoolUnited KingdomUnknown status
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
LondonUnited KingdomUnknown status
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Many LocationsUnited KingdomUnknown status
Swansea Bay University Health Board
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Many LocationsUnited KingdomUnknown status
Marie Curie Hospice
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Many LocationsUnited KingdomUnknown status
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Many LocationsUnited KingdomUnknown status
Royal Stoke University Hospital/University Hospitals North
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Multiple LocationsUnited KingdomUnknown status
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
PlymouthUnited KingdomUnknown status
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
SheffieldUnited KingdomUnknown status
Severn Hospice
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
ShrewsburyUnited KingdomUnknown status
St Margaret's Hospice
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
TauntonUnited KingdomUnknown status
Hounslow and Richmond Community Healthcare
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
TeddingtonUnited KingdomUnknown status
Compton Care
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
WolverhamptonUnited KingdomUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.