Fact CheckerSign in

NCT05223491Completed

En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 16 Jan 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Aim: To compare the surgical method of En Bloc resection to the conventional transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in terms of complete removal of tumour, specimen quality, and pathological certainty. Background: NMIBC is a common disease with a 5-year recurrence rate reported as high as 64%. The cornerstone in the treatment of NMIBC is transurethral resection (TURB) where the tumour is dissected in pieces, removed from the bladder, and pathologically examined for potential muscle invasion. As the tumour is fragmented before removal, the method violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. Hence, TURB is possibly part of the mechanism causing recurrences. En Bloc resection (EBR), where the tumour is removed in toto, can potentially overcome the flaws of conventional TURB, but large randomized trials are needed. Methods: This project will be a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing EBR to conventional TURB. Patients with suspected NMIBC tumours with largest tumour diameter ≥1cm and ≤6cm will be randomised to either the intervention group, thus undergoing EBR, or the control group, undergoing conventional TURB. The investigators intend to include 220 patients in total, 110 patients in each group. The RCT will be initiated in 2022. Perspectives: If EBR can be shown to remove bladder tumours with better pathological quality and certainty, this could potentially spare patients from undergoing surgeries in the future, thereby reducing costs for both patients and society.

Status (registry)
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220 (actual)
First submitted
7 Jan 2022
Start date
17 Mar 2022
Primary completion date
19 Dec 2025
Lead sponsor
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
NCT number
NCT05223491

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Participants enrolled: 220
  • From 17 Mar 2022 to the primary completion date, 19 Dec 2025
  • 11 sites in 5 countries
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Investigating physician concludes that en bloc resection is not technically possible

Other illness

  • Clinically suspected muscle invasive bladder cancer (invasion in to bladder muscle or extravesical extension visible on CT or solid tumour without papillary elements seen at cystoscopy)

Other

  • Tumour located in a bladder diverticulum
  • Pregnancy

Who the study is looking for

  • Demographics: all BMI, smokers and non-smokers
  • Primary, papillary, non-solid bladder tumour visualised by flexible cystoscopy
  • Tumour diameter measured on CT-scan ≥2cm ≤6cm at largest diameter
  • Ability to fully comprehend the information provided and comply with protocol
  • Signed consent form
  • Patients with multiple tumours can be included if it seems feasible to resect them in one procedure

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (11)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
AalborgDenmarkUnknown status
Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
AarhusDenmarkUnknown status
Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
HerlevDenmarkUnknown status
Department of Urology, Regional Hospital Gødstrup
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
HolstebroDenmarkUnknown status
Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
OdenseDenmarkUnknown status
Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
RoskildeDenmarkUnknown status
Dept. of Urology, Hospital Lilelbælt, Vejle
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
VejleDenmarkUnknown status
Dept. of Urology, North Estonia Medical Centre
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
TallinnEstoniaUnknown status
Dept. of Urology, Turku University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
TurkuFinlandUnknown status
Urological Center, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
RigaLatviaUnknown status
Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
TønsbergNorwayUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.