NCT05522244Completed
The Extended CTA for the Successful Screening of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA (DAYLIGHT) Trial
The ExtendeD Computed tomogrAphy angiographY for the successfuL screenInG of Cardioaortic tHrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA (DAYLIGHT) Trial
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 1 Apr 2025
Brief summary (registry, in English)
Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) represent a subset of cryptogenic strokes that are suspected to have an occult embolic source. The risk of stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS varies between 1.9%/year and 19.0%/year depending on the prevalence of vascular risk factors. Part of the elevated recurrence rate is due to the inability to identify high-risk treatable causes such as cardiac thrombi as those found in the left atrial appendage (LAA), left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), valves, or aortic arch. The most frequently used diagnostic method in clinical practice to detect cardioaortic thrombi is transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). However, the relatively low availability, higher cost, and invasive nature of TEE limit its large-scale usability. In most stroke centers, patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke or TIA undergo a tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) of the neck and intracranial vessels. This standard of care CTA (sCTA) classically includes the aortic arch, the higher portion of the ascending/descending aorta, and the rostral portion of the cardiac chambers, but does not involve the LAA, LV, or cardiac valves. A recent study performed among 300 patients with an acute ischemic stroke showed an overall LAA thrombus detection of 6.6% and 15% in patients with AF by extending the CTA 6 cm below the carina. This is an extraordinarily high prevalence of LAA compared to 0.5% to 4.8% of intracardiac thrombi identified on TEE in most previous studies. The major limitation of previous CTA and TEE studies is their observational design, so the differing prevalence of LAA thrombi could be explained by dissimilar population characteristics or selection bias. Based on the methodological limitation of prior studies and the promising role of extended CTAs (eCTA), a randomized controlled trial comparing eCTA + standard of care stroke workup vs. sCTA + standard of care stroke workup is needed.
- Status (registry)
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 830 (actual)
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2022
- Start date
- 17 Jul 2023
- Primary completion date
- 25 May 2024
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Diseases
- Stroke
- NCT number
- NCT05522244
What you commit to
- Study type: Interventional
- Participants enrolled: 830
- From 17 Jul 2023 to the primary completion date, 25 May 2024
- 1 site in 1 country
- Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them
Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.
Who cannot take part
Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.
Other illness
- Allergy to iodinated contrast agents
- Any contraindication for the clinical use of a CTA for hyperacute stroke care (e.g., end-stage renal disease that contraindicates a CTA), and active or past cancer of the head, neck, or chest)
Other
- Pregnancy
- Lack of a peripheral vein access for intravenous contrast administration
- Patients with known or newly diagnosed AF will not be excluded.
Who the study is looking for
- All adult patients with a suspected cerebrovascular event who are evaluated in the Emergency Department or the Urgent Stroke Prevention Clinic at University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
- A confirmed diagnosis of stroke or TIA is not mandatory for patient enrollment and randomization. However, patients without a cerebrovascular event will be further excluded from the analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. Only patients with an adjudicated ischemic stroke or TIA will be included in the latter analyses. The same patient may be included more than once in the study in case of presenting to the hospital with a suspected stroke on different dates. These patients will be excluded only if they had an outcome event (cardioaortic thrombus) previously adjudicated in the study. The reason for including patients more than once is that the cause of the stroke or the stroke mechanism can change with time (e.g. patient with post-stroke MI developing a new LV thrombus, a patient who had a stroke due to AF who is now on anticoagulants and presents with a new contralateral stroke due to severe carotid artery stenosis).
Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers
Sites (1)
Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.
| Site | City | Country | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|
| London Health Sciences Centre Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status | London | Canada | Unknown status |
This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.