Fact CheckerSign in

NCT05534581Active, not recruitingPhase 4

SINGLE SHOT CHAMPION

Single Shot Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Comparison of Cryoballoon vs. Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - A Multi-Center Non-Inferiority Design Clinical Trial (The SINGLE SHOT CHAMPION Trial)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 27 Mar 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel method, pulse-field ablation (PFA) using the FARAPULSE catheter, has recently been introduced (FARAPULSE PFA, Boston Scientific). However, whether FARAPULSE PFA provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that FARAPULSE PFA has shown in studies not to cause any of the severe complications reported in association with traditional PVI while being highly effective, it might be even safer and more effective for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of PVI using FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for PVI and the FARAPULSE PFA is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The null hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence, the alternative hypothesis postulates that the FARAPULSE PFA is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.

Status (registry)
Active, not recruiting
Phase (registry)
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210 (actual)
First submitted
22 Aug 2022
Start date
26 Sept 2022
Primary completion date
1 Jan 2025
Lead sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
NCT number
NCT05534581

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional · Phase 4
  • Participants enrolled: 210
  • From 26 Sept 2022 to the primary completion date, 1 Jan 2025
  • 2 sites in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Previous left atrial (LA) ablation or LA surgery
  • AF due to reversible causes (e.g. hyperthyroidism, cardiothoracic surgery)
  • Prior mitral valve surgery
  • Ongoing triple therapy

Other illness

  • Myocardial infarction during the 3-month period preceding the consent date
  • Cardiac surgery during the three-month interval preceding the consent date or scheduled cardiac surgery/TAVI procedure
  • Significant congenital heart defect (including atrial septal defects or PV abnormalities but not including PFO)
  • NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • Cerebral ischemic event (stroke or TIA) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date
  • Ongoing systemic infections
  • History of cryoglobulinemia
  • Cardiac amyloidosis

Lab values

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%
  • Significant chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR \<30 ml/min)

Other

  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Pre-existing pulmonary vein stenosis or PV stent
  • Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials
  • Severe mitral regurgitation or moderate/severe mitral stenosis
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (wall thickness \>1.5 cm)
  • Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy less than one (1) year per physician opinion
  • Currently participating in any other clinical trial, which may confound the results of this trial.
  • Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up.

Who the study is looking for

  • Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation documented on a 12 lead ECG or Holter monitor (lasting ≥30 seconds) within the last 24 months. According to current guidelines, paroxysmal is defined as any AF that converts to sinus rhythm within 7 days either spontaneously or by pharmacological or electrical cardioversion
  • Candidate for ablation based on current AF guidelines
  • Continuous anticoagulation with Vitamin-K-Antagonists or a novel oral anticoagulant for ≥4 weeks prior to the ablation; or a transesophageal echocardiography and/or computer tomography that excludes left atrial (LA) thrombus ≤48 hours before ablation
  • Age of 18 years or older on the date of consent
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (2)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
University Hospital Basel
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
BaselSwitzerlandUnknown status
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
BernSwitzerlandUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.