Fact CheckerSign in

NCT05560204Active, not recruiting

Combined Pulsed-field Ablation (PFA) and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Watchman Flx or Amulet

Combined Pulsed-field Ablation (PFA) and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Watchman Flx or Amulet: A Randomized Controlled Study

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 16 Sept 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

AF ablation is an established treatment option for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). While AF ablation helps to maintain cardiac rhythm in sinus, the stroke risk associated with AF persists after ablation. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy is currently the standard therapy before and after successful ablation. Percutaneous LAA Occlusion (LAAO) has been emerged as an alternative to oral anticoagulants for stroke prophylaxis in patients who refused or contraindicated to OAC. As both AF ablation and percutaneous LAAO require transseptal access from to left atrium, combining the two procedures into one single procedure may provide a straightforward strategy aiming at concomitant rhythm control as well as stroke prevention, without the additional risk of multiple procedures. It is showed in previous studies that this approach is feasible and safe. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablation technology that uses high amplitude pulsed electrical fields to ablate tissues through the mechanism of irreversible electroporation. Irreversible electroporation is the application of high electric field to a cell with a resultant increased permeability of the membrane and downstream cell death. Success with PFA depends upon the proximity of the electrode to the target tissue, but not necessarily upon contact. Therefore, with PFA the transseptal access for successful AF ablation is less demanding. Moreover, PFA would induce less pulmonary ridge edema compared to conventional ablation techniques and could potentially causes less PDL. Watchman Flx (Boston Scientific) and Amulet (Abbott) are the two most commonly used LAAO devices. The two devices have different designs, deployment requirements and occlusion results. Both devices have been used in combined procedure. However, there is no data of combined AF ablation and LAAO using the PFA technique, and of combined AF ablation comparing the use of Watchman Flx versus Amulet device. In this randomized controlled study, we aim to assess the feasibility and compare the peri-procedural outcomes and LAA occlusion result of combined AF ablation (using the PFA technique), and LAAO using either the Watchman Flx or the Amulet device.

Status (registry)
Active, not recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (estimated)
First submitted
26 Sept 2022
Start date
1 Jan 2023
Primary completion date
31 Dec 2026
Lead sponsor
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
NCT number
NCT05560204

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Planned participants: 200
  • From 1 Jan 2023 to the primary completion date, 31 Dec 2026
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • had received prior left atrial appendage closure procedure (percutaneous or surgical)
  • are planned to receive concomitant ablation procedure or structural heart interventions other than AF ablation and LAAO (e.g SVT ablation, Aflutter ablation, PFO closure, leadless pacemaker, ASD Closure, etc)

Other

  • are in permanent atrial fibrillation
  • are not eligible for 3 months of oral anticoagulant post ablation
  • has left Atrial thrombus identified by pre-procedure TEE or during procedure
  • patient whom refused or cannot tolerate procedural or post procedural follow-up TEE

Who the study is looking for

  • Paroxysmal or persistent non- valvular atrial fibrillation
  • CHADS2-VASc \>=2
  • Age \>=18; and able to give written consent

Age in the registry: 19 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Prince of Wales Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Hong KongHong Kong SAR ChinaUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.