Fact CheckerSign in

NCT06765356Active, not recruitingPhase 4

Pragmatic Evaluation of a Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation and Related Arrhythmias

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 14 Apr 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

The purpose of this pragmatic study is to evaluate the safety, performance and effectiveness of the FARAPULSE catheter system (FARAWAVE catheter used in combination with the FARASTAR generator), to treat patients with atrial fibrillation during clinically-indicated ablation procedures

Status (registry)
Active, not recruiting
Phase (registry)
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
275 (actual)
First submitted
3 Jan 2025
Start date
15 Apr 2025
Primary completion date
30 Mar 2027
Lead sponsor
Vivek Reddy
NCT number
NCT06765356

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional · Phase 4
  • Participants enrolled: 275
  • From 15 Apr 2025 to the primary completion date, 30 Mar 2027
  • 9 sites in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • PCI/STEMI within the prior 1 month
  • Currently, enrolled in an investigational study evaluating another device, biologic, or drug, that would interfere with this trial.

Other illness

  • Reversible cause of AF (e.g., post-operative, thyroid disorder, etc.)
  • Conditions that make an AF ablation procedure unlikely to be successful (e.g., advanced infiltrative cardiomyopathies like amyloid, severe mitral stenosis or regurgitation, and cor pulmonale)
  • Active systemic infection or sepsis
  • Life expectancy or other disease processes likely to limit survival to less than 12 months

Age

  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or who are of childbearing age and plan on becoming pregnant during this trial.

Other

  • Documented "active" left atrial thrombus (patients may later undergo the procedure if this is no longer present, eg, with anticoagulation treatment)
  • Contraindication to all anticoagulation
  • Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude an ablation procedure

Who the study is looking for

  • Age 18 or older
  • Diagnosed with atrial fibrillation with or without concomitant atrial flutter by ECG at some point in the past, and by any criteria (ECG or clear symptoms within the past year)
    • Previous catheter ablation for other arrhythmias (including left-sided ablation, but not for AF) is allowed
  • Planned for a clinically-indicated catheter ablation procedure for managing paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation in accordance with the following recommendations in the ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guidelines
    • In patients with symptomatic AF in whom antiarrhythmic drugs have been ineffective, contraindicated, not tolerated or not preferred, and continued rhythm control is desired, catheter ablation is useful to improve symptoms.(Class 1)
    • In selected patients (generally younger with few comorbidities) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF in whom rhythm control is desired, catheter ablation is useful as first-line therapy to improve symptoms and reduce progression to persistent AF. (Class 1)
    • In patients (other than younger with few comorbidities) with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF who are being managed with a rhythm-control strategy, catheter ablation as first-line therapy can be useful to improve symptoms. (Class 2a)
    • In selected patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic AF, catheter ablation may be useful for reducing progression of AF and its associated complications. (Class 2b)
    • In patients who present with a new diagnosis of HFrEF and AF, arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy should be suspected, and an early and aggressive approach to AF rhythm control is recommended. (Class 1)
    • In appropriate patients with AF and HFrEF who are on GDMT, and with reasonable expectation of procedural benefit, catheter ablation is beneficial to improve symptoms, QOL, ventricular function, and cardiovascular outcomes. (Class 1)
    • In appropriate patients with symptomatic AF and HFpEF with reasonable expectation of benefit, catheter ablation can be useful to improve symptoms and improve QOL. (Class 2a)
    • In athletes who develop AF, catheter ablation with PVI is a reasonable strategy for rhythm control because of its effectiveness and low risk of detrimental effect on exercise capacity. (Class 2a)
  • Have in place or have plans for implantation of a loop recorder, pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator capable of recording atrial rhythm (e.g. dual chamber) (ideally, this implantable device would be present for at least 4 weeks pre-PFA)
  • Able and willing to provide written consent and comply with all testing and follow-up requirements

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (9)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Ohio Health Research Institute
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
ColumbusUnited StatesUnknown status
UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
HarrisburgUnited StatesUnknown status
Arrhythmia Research Group
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
JonesboroUnited StatesUnknown status
Naples Comprehensive Health
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
NaplesUnited StatesUnknown status
Mount Sinai Morningside
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
New YorkUnited StatesUnknown status
The Mount Sinai Hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
New YorkUnited StatesUnknown status
Trident Medical Center
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
North CharlestonUnited StatesUnknown status
Cardiology Associates Medical Group
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
VenturaUnited StatesUnknown status
Sentara Health Research Center
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Virginia BeachUnited StatesUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.