Fact CheckerSign in

NCT06767657Recruiting

Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) Versus Delayed CEA in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (SPREAD-STACI II)

Multicenter, Open-label Randomized Study Comparing Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) (Within 72 Hours) Versus Delayed CEA (After 72 Hours) in Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (SPREAD-STACI II)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 4 Mar 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

In patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis of 50% or greater (measured according to the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)) who have experienced a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ipsilateral stroke, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) offers maximum benefit if performed within 15 days of the initial ischemic symptom. National and international guidelines recommend surgical treatment (CEA) within this timeframe; however, no studies have specifically evaluated the optimal timing for CEA after a TIA or minor stroke. It is well established that the risk of a major stroke is highest in the first few days following a transient ischemic attack or minor stroke and then decreases over the subsequent days and weeks. This raises the hypothesis that performing an urgent carotid endarterectomy (within 3 days) may provide greater benefit compared to a delayed procedure (between 4 and 15 days).

Status (registry)
Recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
456 (estimated)
First submitted
23 Dec 2024
Start date
3 Jul 2025
Primary completion date
1 Sept 2027
Lead sponsor
Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Diseases
Stroke
NCT number
NCT06767657

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Planned participants: 456
  • From 3 Jul 2025 to the primary completion date, 1 Sept 2027
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Previous CEA or stenting of the examined carotid artery.

Other illness

  • Carotid thrombosis or dissection. NIHSS \> 5. Cerebral hemorrhage. Impaired consciousness or neurologically unstable condition. Cancer, any condition with a poor prognosis, major cardiopathy, or any severe neurological disorder.

Age

  • CT or MRI evidence of cerebral ischemia \> 25 mm in diameter. CT or MRI evidence of cerebral lesions of uncertain origin. Recurrent TIA or stroke-in-evolution. Age \< 45 years or \> 90 years. ASA risk score = 4. Lack of informed consent. Inability to undergo CEA within 72 hours of the initial ischemic symptom. Inability to participate in a 90-day follow-up after the initial ischemic symptom.

Other

  • Stenosis \< 50% (NASCET method) at the bifurcation and/or internal carotid artery origin, diagnosed by ECD, CTA, or MRA.

Who the study is looking for

  • Patients presenting with the following characteristics:
  • De novo stenosis of the carotid bifurcation and/or internal carotid artery origin, equal to or greater than 50% (NASCET method), diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound, MR angiography (MRA), CT angiography (CTA), or catheter angiography.
  • TIA or minor ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) ipsilateral to the carotid stenosis, occurring within the previous 24 hours.
  • Preserved consciousness and neurologically stable symptoms. No evidence of ongoing cerebral ischemia, or evidence of cerebral ischemia with a diameter \<25 mm.
  • Age between 45 and 90 years. ASA score \< 4. Ability to comply with follow-up requirements as specified. Willingness to provide informed consent for participation in the study.
  • A patient with an NIHSS ≤ 5 who is aphasic may be unable to provide consent. In these cases:
  • The attending physician assesses the feasibility of including the patient. Family members are informed but, under Italian law, cannot provide consent. A third-party physician certifies that the patient meets the inclusion criteria.
  • The attending physician signs the appropriate form, and randomization proceeds. If and when the patient regains the ability to provide or refuse consent, the informed consent form will be presented to them. Should they decline, their data will be removed from the study database.
  • Additionally, the study includes patients who underwent thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy after the onset of the index symptom, followed by a brain CT/MRI without secondary cerebral hemorrhage (PH1, PH2, or PHr).

Criteria the registry did not label

  • Eligibility Criteria

Age in the registry: 45 years to 90 years · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Usl Toscana Centro
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
FlorenceItalyNot yet recruiting

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.