Fact CheckerSign in

NCT06836596Completed

Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyogram (EMG) On Functional Recovery Of Hand in Chronic Stroke Survivors :Randomized Controlled Trial

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 20 Feb 2025

Brief summary (registry, in English)

This study aims to find out which treatment works better for improving hand function in stroke patients: sensory electrical stimulation or alternating electromyogram (EMG) stimulation. Both methods use electrical stimulation to help patients regain hand movement, but they work in slightly different ways. The goal is to see if one method is more effective than the other in helping stroke survivors recover their hand abilities.

Status (registry)
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
First submitted
15 Feb 2025
Start date
1 Dec 2023
Primary completion date
7 Dec 2024
Lead sponsor
Suez University
Diseases
Stroke
NCT number
NCT06836596

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Participants enrolled: 60
  • From 1 Dec 2023 to the primary completion date, 7 Dec 2024
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Other illness

  • Hand function impairment caused by factors other than stroke, unstable health conditions such as cardiac dysfunction, end-stage renal failure, or uncontrolled diabetes, long-term use of medications that may affect motor or sensory excitability, contractures or restrictions in wrist joint range of motion, pre-existing musculoskeletal diseases significantly impacting physical function, and a history of Botulinum Toxin injection in the hand muscles.

Who the study is looking for

  • Chronic stroke patients were between 45 and 65 years old, with a duration of illness ranging from 6 to 18 months post-stroke. They exhibited upper extremity spasticity no greater than 1+ on the Modified Ashworth Scale. Patients were cooperative, as indicated by a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of ≥ 24, and were capable of grasping and releasing at least one block in the Box and Block Test.

Age in the registry: 45 years to 65 years · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Faculty of physical therapy, Cairo universuty
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
GizaEgyptUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.