Fact CheckerSign in

NCT06932692Recruiting

The BRAINMAP-DBS Study: BRain Network AnalysIs usiNg 7-Tesla MRI and MAgnetoencephalograPhy for Deep Brain Stimulation

The BRAINMAP-DBS Study

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 17 Apr 2025 · Not updated for over 12 months - ask the site whether it is still open

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. The effect of DBS relies on the modulation of dysfunctional motor brain networks and on average 50% motor improvement is achieved, using standardized motor evaluation scores. However, approximately 20% of treated patients show insufficient benefit, with less than 30% improvement. To improve outcomes through better electrode placement and selection of DBS electrical parameter programming, more advanced visualization of motor networks is needed; both anatomical (7-Tesla MRI) and functional (magnetoencephalography, MEG). Current DBS implantations are based on 1.5- or 3- Tesla MR scans. The resolution of these scans is not sufficient to visualize brain networks, preventing electrode placement directed at motor parts within the brain nucleus. In addition to the 7-Tesla MRI guided electrode placement, by applying MEG, programming will be directed at influencing the cortical motor areas, resulting in an overall decrease in dysfunctional network activity. Objective: Primary objective of the study is to determine whether brain network visualization using 7T MRI and MEG improves motor symptoms as measured by the disease-specific Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) and Tremor Assessment Rating Scale (TETRAS); and quality of life as measured by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). Secondary outcomes are: disease related daily functioning, adverse effects, operation time, quality of life (QUEST), patient satisfaction with treatment outcome and patient evaluation of treatment burden. Study design: Single-center, prospective study with repeated measures; standardized assessments of motor skills and quality of life (UPDRS-III, TETRAS, PDQ-39) after DBS placement will be compared with scores after adjustments based on network analyses. Study population: Enrollment will be ongoing from April 2024. Intervention (if applicable): Patients with DBS for a minimum of six months will undergo an additional MEG scan. Application of 7T MRI for DBS is standard care and outcome scores used will be readily accessible from the already existing advanced electronic DBS database. Main study parameters/endpoints: The co-primary outcome measures are the change in motor symptoms (measured by the UPDRS-III,TETRAS) and quality of life (measured by the PDQ-39). This is measured as part of standard care. The secondary outcome measures are the Amsterdam Linear Disability Score for functional health status, Starkstein apathy scale, Quality of Life Questionnaire in Essential Tremor (QUEST), patient satisfaction with the treatment, patient evaluation of treatment burden, operating time, hospitalization time, change of tremor medication, side effects and complications. The primary and secondary outcome scores are already stored in our advanced electronic DBS database. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The 7-Tesla MRI and MEG protocols (including stimulation parameters) already developed by our group and reported in (five) studies will be applied. After selecting the best DBS programming, the aim is to optimize DBS outcome by: a) increasing the mean improvement in motor function and quality of life by at least 10% and b) achieving a minimum of 30% improvement in motor function for each patient (measured by standardized assessment of motor function and quality of life). The proposed research project involves treatment options that are non-invasive and/or part of standard care in daily practice. The therapies will not be combined with other research products. Participation in this study constitutes negligible risk according to NFU criteria for human research.

Status (registry)
Recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500 (estimated)
First submitted
10 Apr 2025
Start date
23 Apr 2024
Primary completion date
31 Dec 2035
Lead sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
NCT number
NCT06932692

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Planned participants: 500
  • From 23 Apr 2024 to the primary completion date, 31 Dec 2035
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • There a no implants inadmissible in the MEG, although patients will be questioned for possible (non-removable) implants such as pacemakerand/or dental as they may interfere with the magnetic signals

Other

  • A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • Legally incompetent adults;
  • No written informed consent.
  • A spinal stimulation or deep brain stimulation system is not compatible with 7-Tesla MRI

Who the study is looking for

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Age \> 18 years;
  • Idiopathic PD/ET with at least six months of DBS
  • Underwent a preoperative 7-Tesla MRI scan

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Amsterdam UMC
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
AmsterdamNetherlandsRecruiting

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.