Promoting Safer Sexual Dual Protection Behaviors for Female University Students to Reduce Risks of Both STI/HIV and Unintended Pregnancy

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Background: Young women are at the greatest risk for STI/HIV infections and unintended pregnancy resulting from unsafe sexual practices. While there is a growing interest in promoting dual protection as a means of preventing both risks of HIV/STIs and unwanted pregnancy simultaneously, there is limited evidence of effective interventions and strategies for promoting dual protection behaviors in youth based on theoretical models. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model-based safer sexual dual protection (SSDP) intervention to promote safer sexual dual protection behaviors among female university students in Ethiopia. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental nonrandomized control group design with a pretest-posttest study to assess changes in the levels of knowledge, motivation, behavioral skills, and practice of safe sexual dual protection behaviors with dual protection use in the intervention group compared to the control group. We recruited 1,020 female university students from two campuses of Mattu University using non-randomized assignment of each campus to either the intervention group or the control group. We collected data from both groups using a self-administered questionnaire at baseline and six months post-intervention. At both times, the collected data were cleaned, edited, and analyzed using SPSS version 23. For the baseline data analysis, we used descriptive statistics to summarize the distribution of participants based on their demographic characteristics and levels of information, motivation, behavioral skills, and behaviors. We also conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS 23 (Teo, 2009; Kline, 2023) to examine correlates and predictors of risky and safer sexual practices and dual protection use and identify important variables to be addressed in targeted intervention for this population. Then, based on the elicitation research findings, we designed IMB-model-based SSDP interventions consisting of 16-hrs sessions to be delivered over a 6 weeks period. To evaluate the intervention effects at posttest, we performed a series of statistical analyses, such as chi-square (χ2) tests of differences between the two groups, along with 95% CI for the differences, and logistic regression analysis of the intervention effects, along with AOR for the effect size measure, after controlling for the effects of other confounding variables.

What you commit to

• Study type: Interventional
• Participants enrolled: 1020
• From 1 Apr 2023 to the primary completion date, 20 Dec 2023
• 1 site in 1 country
• Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Who the study is looking for

Age in the registry: 18 years to 25 years · Sex: Female · Accepts healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.