IVM - Fresh ET (THE SAIGON PROTOCOL) Versus IVF - FET in PCOS Women

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) aim to increase success rates while minimizing patient risks. For women with high AFC or PCOS, conventional IVF carries a high risk of OHSS (Ho et al., 2019). A modern IVF strategy to prevent this uses a GnRH agonist trigger, requiring a "freeze-all" and subsequent FET (Wong et al., 2017). This reduces OHSS risk but can increase time to pregnancy (Vuong et al., 2021) and treatment burden. IVM is a patient-friendly alternative that eliminates OHSS risk by avoiding high-dose gonadotropins. A 2020 trial by Vuong et al. compared CAPA-IVM-FET to conventional IVF-FET in women with high AFC. IVM yielded a comparable live birth rate (35.2%) versus IVF (43.2%), with a 0% OHSS rate in IVM compared to 0.7% in IVF (Vuong et al., 2020). The optimal transfer method (fresh or frozen) in IVM cycles is debated. A 2021 pilot RCT by Vuong et al. found a freeze-only strategy after CAPA-IVM led to a significantly higher live birth rate (60%) than a fresh transfer (20%) (Vuong et al., 2021), but increased time to pregnancy (194 vs. 150 days) (Vuong et al., 2021). A refined CAPA-IVM protocol, which uses no gonadotropins, allowed for fresh embryo transfer in the same cycle, resulting in a numerically higher ongoing pregnancy rate (43.3% vs. 33.3%) than FET (Vuong et al., 2025). This raises an important question: how does a simplified IVM strategy with fresh transfer compare to the established "safety-net" IVF strategy with FET? These two approaches represent opposing clinical philosophies. No large-scale study has yet compared them in women with PCOS. Therefore, this study is designed to compare the SAIGON protocol (gonadotropin-free CAPA-IVM with fresh ET) against a standard GnRH-antagonist IVF protocol with agonist trigger and subsequent FET.

What you commit to

• Study type: Interventional
• Planned participants: 600
• From 22 Sept 2025 to the primary completion date, 1 Oct 2027
• 1 site in 1 country
• Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Who the study is looking for

Age in the registry: 18 years to 42 years · Sex: Female · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.