Sign in

NCT07259798Completed

Histopathological Findings in En-Bloc vs Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Comparison Between En-Bloc Transurethral Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Urinary Bladder Tumors From 2 to 6 cm in Size, Histopathological Findings.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 10 Dec 2025

Brief summary (registry, in English)

This study is designed to determine whether en-bloc TURBT provides superior histopathological quality and clinical outcomes compared to conventional TURBT in medium-sized bladder tumors.

Status (registry)
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (actual)
First submitted
21 Nov 2025
Start date
1 Aug 2024
Primary completion date
1 Feb 2025
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
NCT number
NCT07259798

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Participants enrolled: 50
  • From 1 Aug 2024 to the primary completion date, 1 Feb 2025
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • concomitant urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract

Other illness

  • metastatic bladder cancer

Other

  • recurrent bladder tumours.

Who the study is looking for

  • Tumor diameter of 2-6 cm
  • Patients fit for spinal or general anesthesia

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Ain Shams University
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
CairoEgyptUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.