Sign in

NCT07272850Not yet recruiting

Comparison Between JAK Inhibitors and Traditional Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Comparison Between Haematological Parameters and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Findings of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Recieving JAK Inhibitors Versus Traditional Treatment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 9 Dec 2025

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects about 1% of the world's population \[1\]. The disease is characterized by synovial membrane inflammation. The impact of RA on quality of life is significant, as it can lead to considerable disability, reduced mobility, and an increased risk of additional health complications \[2\]. CsDMARDs are the first-line drugs for RA treatment, of which methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone drug and monotherapy is recommended as the first choice (3). However, previous studies had shown that 50% of RA patients had poor treatment effect on methotrexate or inadequate response to re-medication after relapse, resulting in drug resistance (4), resulting in no significant relief of symptoms and still high disease activity. EULAR had indicated that interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitors and JAK inhibitors may have advantages over other biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients who were not suitable for csDMARDs (5) Therefore, JAK inhibitors is used as monotherapy or combination therapy, which would provide a new strategy for clinical treatment. A few researches evaluated the relationship between PLT, RBC, Hb, red blood cells-platelet ratio (RPR), and the hemoglobin-platelet ratio (HPR) and RA disease activity. There is growing evidence that metrics like RDW and MPV, as well as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and others have been considered to be accurate, reliable inflammatory biomarkers in autoimmune illnesses\[6,7\] US has proven itself to be a useful imaging method for assessing articular and periarticular inflammation in small and large joints throughout the last years High resolution musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), incorporating power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS), has demonstrated to be significantly more accurate than clinical evaluation in visualizing the inflammatory process. Furthermore, relatively few studies have examined ankle joint involvement in individuals with RA who lack symptoms \[8\].

Status (registry)
Not yet recruiting
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
72 (estimated)
First submitted
2 Oct 2025
Start date
20 Dec 2025
Primary completion date
20 Jun 2026
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
NCT number
NCT07272850

What you commit to

  • Study type: Observational
  • Planned participants: 72
  • From 20 Dec 2025 to the primary completion date, 20 Jun 2026
  • No sites listed in no country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Other illness

  • • the presence of other autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus or psoriatic arthritis),
    • history of active infections, malignancy, or chronic diseases affecting hematological
    • parameters (e.g., anemia unrelated to RA, chronic kidney disease)
    • RA patients in remission
    • pregnant and lactating female patients

Who the study is looking for

  • • RA patients based on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classifcation criteria for RA.
    • Age; 18-60

Age in the registry: 18 years to 60 years · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.