Fact CheckerSign in

NCT07378163Recruiting

Study on the Preferences for PCI Implantation Devices Among Doctors and Patients

Study on the Preferences for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Implantation Devices Among Healthcare Providers and Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 30 Jan 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

The contemporary percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease typically involves initial lesion preparation with balloon angioplasty, followed by the deployment of a drug-eluting stent (DES) to provide an immediate scaffold and reduce the long-term risk of restenosis. However, stent implantation continues to present notable challenges, primarily due to the metallic scaffold left behind. Compared to DES, drug-coated balloons (DCB) provide a direct release of antiproliferative drugs into the vessel wall, preventing coronary restenosis after angioplasty and limiting the risk of stent-related events. DCBs are an established treatment option for in-stent restenosis and small vessels. However, the REC-CAGEFREE I trial demonstrated that a strategy of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting did not achieve non-inferiority compared with the intended DES implantation in patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease (CAD), irrespective of vessel diameter. Previous studies have mainly focused on the efficacy of PCI strategies in reducing adverse event rates, while less attention has been paid to patients' willingness regarding stent implantation. The AHA conducted a systematic review on depression and poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), concluding that health organizations should consider depression as an official risk factor for poor prognosis after ACS. A prior study of patients with coronary artery disease after stent implantation found that their anxiety stemmed primarily from concerns about the stent's long-term effects and its impact on their social interaction. However, data regarding patients' preferences on the selection of DES or DCB is scarce, and whether the psychological impact would differ between DES- or DCB-treated patients is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the preferences of patients, as well as medical staff, for DES or DCB-based PCI.

Status (registry)
Recruiting
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
600 (estimated)
First submitted
22 Jan 2026
Start date
18 Aug 2025
Primary completion date
1 Mar 2026
Lead sponsor
Xijing Hospital
NCT number
NCT07378163

What you commit to

  • Study type: Observational
  • Planned participants: 600
  • From 18 Aug 2025 to the primary completion date, 1 Mar 2026
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Other illness

  • Inability to understand the questionnaire or presence of cognitive impairment.

Age

  • Aged \< 18 years;

Who the study is looking for

  • Patients with acute or chronic coronary syndrome who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention;
  • Patients who can understand the purpose of this trial and are willing to participate in the preference questionnaire.
  • Healthcare providers who treat patients with coronary artery disease.

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Xijing hospital
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Xi'anChinaRecruiting

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.