Fact CheckerSign in

NCT07380490Recruiting

Comparing Two PFO Closure Devices in Adults With Previous Stroke or TIA

Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and EfficAcy of the Cocoon PFO Occluder Versus Amplatzer PFO ClosurE Device for Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack A Non-Profit, Single-blind, Investigator Driven Trial

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 5 Oct 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blind, investigator-driven, non-profit clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Cocoon PFO Occluder with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder family in patients requiring percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Eligible participants are adults with a history of cryptogenic embolic stroke or neurologically confirmed transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 12 months and a PFO suitable for transcatheter closure. A total of up to 1260 subjects will be enrolled across multiple European centers. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the Cocoon PFO Occluder (experimental group) or an Amplatzer PFO closure device (control group). The procedure will be performed as soon as possible after randomization, preferably within 14 days and no later than 45 days. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of a composite outcome at 12 months, including recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or all-cause death. Secondary endpoints include PFO closure rate at 6 months, assessed by echocardiographic imaging, and other measures of safety, device performance, and clinical outcomes. The study is conducted in a single-blind fashion: patients will not be informed of the device they receive unless they explicitly request this information. Any patient who chooses to be unblinded will continue to participate without affecting eligibility or follow-up, and the date of unblinding will be documented to allow appropriate sensitivity analyses. This trial aims to provide robust comparative evidence on the clinical performance of the Cocoon PFO Occluder relative to the Amplatzer PFO Occluder to guide optimal device selection in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA associated with PFO.

Status (registry)
Recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1260 (estimated)
First submitted
25 Nov 2025
Start date
24 Jul 2026
Primary completion date
Jul 2028
Lead sponsor
Giuseppe Tarantini
Diseases
Stroke
NCT number
NCT07380490

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Planned participants: 1260
  • From 24 Jul 2026 to the primary completion date, Jul 2028
  • 1 site in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Previous intracardiac surgery or percutaneous PFO-closure
  • Contraindications to anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs, either before or after the PFO closure procedure
  • Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint yet

Other illness

  • Patients who have definite causes of stroke or transient ischemic attack unrelated to the PFO
  • Active endocarditis or other untreated infectious diseases
  • Left ventricular aneurysm or akinesis Myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within 12 months
  • Patients with non-embolic cryptogenic stroke (for example lacunar stroke) or with other identifiable causes of stroke, including but not limited to aortic arch plaques (protruding \>4 mm into the lumen), large artery atherosclerotic disease, an established cardioembolic source, small-vessel occlusive disease, or arterial dissection
  • Glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or with any history of renal dialysis or renal transplantation
  • Severe pulmonary disease including pulmonary hypertension (clinical diagnosis)
  • Uncontrollable hypertension or diabetes mellitus
  • Patients diagnosed with a neurological disease that causes progressive neurological dysfunction
  • Malignant tumors or other serious diseases resulting in a life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Psychiatric conditions that may interfere with medical compliance and compliance with follow-up
  • Patient with any medical condition that would make him/her inappropriate for treatment as per the current IFU of respective devices or in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Stroke with poor outcome at time of enrollment (Modified Rankin score \>3)

Lab values

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%
  • Severe liver function impairment (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal value)

Other

  • RLS caused by other causes, such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary arteriovenous shunt
  • Patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (chronic or intermittent) Intracardiac thrombus or tumor
  • Patients with mitral or aortic valve stenosis or severe regurgitation
  • Mitral or aortic valve vegetation or prosthesis
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy
  • Atherosclerosis or arteriopathy of intra- or extracranial vessels with \>50% diameter stenosis in the artery supplying the infarcted territory.
  • Active or planned (within 12 months) pregnancy, or lactating female patients
  • Patients with hypercoagulable states
  • Anatomy in which the device would interfere with intracardiac or vascular structures
  • Inability to obtain Informed Consent from patient or legally authorized representatives
  • Subjects who will not be available for follow up for the duration of the trial

Who the study is looking for

  • Patients with \>18 years of age and \<65 years of age, regardless of gender
  • Patients with normal or aneurysm type PFO confirmed by imaging examination \[Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)/ Transesophageal Echocardiography (TOE) or Intracardiac Echocardiography\], and who exhibit spontaneous right-to-left shunting or right-to-left shunting during Valsalva maneuver.
  • Patients with history of cryptogenic embolic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the previous 12 months \[stroke is defined as acute focal neurological deficit presumed to be due to focal ischemia, and either 1) symptoms persisting 24 hours or greater, or 2) symptoms persisting less than 24 hours but associated with MR or CT findings of a new, neuroanatomically relevant, cerebral infarct. Transient Ischemic Attack is defined as acute focal neurological deficit (defined as focal motor deficit, aphasia, difficulty walking, hemisensory deficit, amaurosis fugax, blindness, or focal visual deficit) presumed due to focal ischemia, lasting between 5 minutes and 24 hours, that is not associated with MR or CT findings of a new cerebral infarct\]. The diagnosis of cryptogenic embolic stroke or TIA has to be confirmed by a neurologist.
  • The size of PFO must be amenable to selection of a Cocoon PFO Occluder or Amplatzer PFO closure device.
  • Patients are informed of the nature of the trial and agree to all requirements for participation in the trial, signed the informed consent form, and agreed to complete the follow-up and follow-up examination

Age in the registry: 18 years to 65 years · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Heart and Diabetes Center NRW (HDZ NRW), Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Bad OeynhausenGermanyRecruiting

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.