Clinical Outcomes and Quality Of Life After Minimally Invasive Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Brief summary (registry, in English)

The goal is to compare patient reported outcomes, such as dyspnea, physical functioning and quality of life, between minimally invasive segmentectomy and lobectomy for stage I NSCLC during the first year after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do patients with stage I NSCLC that undergo minimally invasive segmentectomy have less postoperative dyspnea than patients that undergo lobectomy? * Do patients with stage I NSCLC that undergo minimally invasive segmentectomy have more favorable postoperative health related quality of life (HRQoL) than patients that undergo lobectomy? * Do patients with stage I NSCLC that undergo VATS segmentectomy or lobectomy have more favorable postoperative health related quality of life (HRQoL) than patients that undergo RATS segmentectomy or lobectomy? Participants already undergoing surgical intervention as part of their regular medical care for resectable lung cancer will answer quality of life questionnaires preoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

What you commit to

• Study type: Observational
• Planned participants: 180
• From 10 Jul 2023 to the primary completion date, 1 Dec 2027
• 1 site in 1 country
• Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Who the study is looking for

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.