Comprehensive Prospective Comparison Of Two Robotic Platforms In Anatomical Lung Resections: Clinical Outcomes And Cost-utility Analysis

Brief summary (registry, in English)

The goal is to compare clinical outcomes, hospital costs, and cost-utility in patients undergoing anatomical lung resections with DaVinci Xi vs Versius platforms The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do patients that undergo an anatomical lung resection with DaVinci Xi have the same clinical outcomes (complications, stay...) than those who were operated with Versius? * Are anatomical lung resections performed with DaVinci Xi more expensive than those performed with Versius? * Are anatomical lung resection performed with DaVinci Xi more cost-effective than those performed with Versius? Participants already undergoing robotic anatomical lung resection as part of their regular medical care will answer quality of life questionnaires preoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

What you commit to

• Study type: Observational
• Planned participants: 150
• From 1 Apr 2023 to the primary completion date, 31 Jul 2026
• 1 site in 1 country
• Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Who the study is looking for

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.