A Comparison of Accuracy Between Different Facial Scanning Techniques

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Conventional alginate impressions are still a burden to both the patient and the operator especially in extraoral maxillofacial rehabilitations cases. Nowadays face scanners are becoming more popular with their increased accuracy in taking facial scans, facilitating the digital workflow. This study will be done to investigate the accuracy of three different face scanning techniques; stationary, handheld and mobile application techniques. A number of sixty volunteers will be recruited. Conventional facial impressions will be made for each participant and the resulting casts will be desktop scanned to act as the control group. Three face scanning techniques will be used for each participant; stationary (Ray face scanner), handheld (Shining 3d face scanner) and mobile phone applications (Heges; Maerk Simonik). The STL files will be compared to that of the control group for comparison of accuracy in the terms of Trueness and Precision.

What you commit to

• Study type: Interventional
• Planned participants: 60
• From 2 May 2026 to the primary completion date, 1 Oct 2026
• No sites listed in no country
• Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Who the study is looking for

Sex: All · Accepts healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov