Fact CheckerSign in

NCT07560891Not yet recruiting

LBBAP vs. CS Pacing for CRT in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure (SYNC-AF)

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: The SYNC-AF Trial

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 1 May 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP)-based cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with conventional coronary sinus (CS) lead-based CRT in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) who meet indications for CRT device implantation. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure frequently coexist, and both rapid heart rate and its irregularity contribute to worsening cardiac function. Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation combined with CRT (biventricular pacing) has been established as an effective strategy for rate control and cardiac resynchronization in this population, supported by Class I recommendation in the 2021 ESC guidelines. However, conventional biventricular CRT via the CS lead can induce artificial electrical dyssynchrony, particularly in patients with a narrow QRS complex, potentially limiting its benefit. Conduction system pacing (CSP), including LBBAP, has emerged as a physiologic alternative that directly stimulates the native conduction system, preserving synchronous ventricular activation. Recent evidence (ALTERNATIVE-AF trial) suggests CSP may be superior to biventricular CRT in permanent AF patients undergoing AVJ ablation. However, no randomized controlled trial has directly compared LBBAP-based CRT with CS lead-based CRT in this specific population. The SYNC-AF trial will randomize 44 patients (22 per arm) to either LBBAP or CS pacing for CRT. The primary endpoint is change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 12 months as assessed by echocardiography in a blinded core laboratory. Secondary endpoints include changes in QRS duration, major adverse clinical events, device/procedure-related complications, and ventricular arrhythmia burden.

Status (registry)
Not yet recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44 (estimated)
First submitted
23 Apr 2026
Start date
Jun 2026
Primary completion date
Jun 2029
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
NCT number
NCT07560891

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional
  • Planned participants: 44
  • From Jun 2026 to the primary completion date, Jun 2029
  • No sites listed in no country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Prior myocardial infarction involving the interventricular septal area

Other illness

  • History of heart transplantation

Other

  • Prosthetic tricuspid valve
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Unable to comply with planned 12-month follow-up for any reason
  • Pregnancy
  • Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC)

Who the study is looking for

  • Age ≥19 years
  • Indication for CRT (CRT-P or CRT-D) device implantation per current guidelines
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation (with or without planned AVJ ablation)
  • Ability to understand the purpose of the study and provide written informed consent

Age in the registry: 19 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.