Trial Comparing CPDMA Versus Standard Breadloafing in WLE Specimens of Stage 1-II Cutaneous Melanoma

Brief summary (registry, in English)

The primary goal of this clinical trial is to is to compare the rate of positive peripheral margins in wide local excision (WLE) performed to allow for comprehensive peripheral and deep margin assessment (CPDMA) assessment versus WLE performed with the intent of standard breadloafing of stage I-II cutaneous melanoma specimens. Secondary aims are to compare local recurrence at 1 and 2 years, the rate of re-excision due to positive margins, pathology turnaround time, pathology resource utilization, and cost per case between the two assessment methods. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does WLE performed to allow for CPDMA have a higher rate of positive peripheral margins than wide local excision performed with the intent of standard breadloafing? * Will more complete positive margin detection support more appropriate re-excision and lower local recurrence over two years? * Does CPDMA require greater pathology resource utilization and longer turnaround time than breadloafing? Researchers will compare standard breadloafing (control) arm to CPDMA (experimental) arm. Participants will: * Undergo WLE. * Attend a follow-up visit at 4 months.

What you commit to

• Study type: Interventional
• Planned participants: 282
• From 24 Dec 2026 to the primary completion date, 24 Dec 2029
• 1 site in 1 country
• Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Who the study is looking for

Age in the registry: 19 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (1)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.