Research summary ·
Diagnostic performance of MRI and transvaginal ultrasound for urinary tract endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machine-written explainer in our own words, checked against the source record · 12 Nov 2026. How it's made
What was studied
This review compared 2 imaging tests for urinary tract endometriosis. The tests were transvaginal ultrasound and MRI. They looked at the ureter and the bladder. The team searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus up to December 2025. Surgery served as the reference. Results were pooled.
What they found
For the ureter, ultrasound had sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 1.00. MRI had sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 1.00. For the bladder, ultrasound had sensitivity of 0.70 and specificity of 1.00. MRI had sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.99. Results differed a lot between studies, mostly for sensitivity.
What it means for patients
The team says both tests have excellent specificity. MRI has slightly higher sensitivity for the ureter. Both have moderate sensitivity for the bladder. They back a site-specific mix of both tests, with care over negative results.
Why it is not certain yet
Differences between studies were large. This was most true for sensitivity. The range for MRI sensitivity in the ureter was wide. It ran from 0.50 to 1.00. A review can only be as good as the studies in it.
Source
Diagnostic performance of MRI and transvaginal ultrasound for urinary tract endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PubMed · PMID 42988935We restate facts from the source record in our own words. The original wording belongs to its publisher.
This page is not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about your own care.
Back to Endometriosis news