Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in FrancePhase 2

Tests surgery to remove returning glioblastoma brain tumors

Compares surgery plus second-line therapy with second-line therapy alone in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Surgery for Recurrent Glioblastoma

Key facts

Where
Dijon, Lyon, Marseille, Nice, Paris, Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg, and Tours, FranceSee the 8 sites
Phase
Phase 2

Could this be for you?

Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.

  • How old are you?
  • Have you had radiotherapy to your head or brain?

Source: NCT02394626, who can take part

Where in France

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Department of NeurosurgeryDijon, FranceTaking people
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon - CHU de Lyon, Department of Neuro-OncologyLyon, FranceTaking people
  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Department of Neuro-OncologyMarseille, FranceTaking people
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Department of NeurosurgeryNice, FranceTaking people
  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of NeurosurgeryParis, FranceTaking people
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Department of NeurosurgerySaint-Etienne, FranceTaking people
  • Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Department of OncologyStrasbourg, FranceTaking people
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours), Department of NeurosurgeryTours, FranceTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Trial code
NCT02394626
Record updated
2 February 2026
Original description
Patients with glioblastoma face a grim prognosis. Despite recent advancement in neurosurgical technology and neuro-oncology glioblastomas almost invariably progress or recur after a median of 4-8 months. The strategy to repeat tumor resection at recurrence in order to minimize tumor load and thus to facilitate subsequent second-line therapy has been shown to be feasible and safe.Read full original descriptionShow less

RESURGE - Randomized Controlled Comparative Phase II Trial on Surgery for Glioblastoma Recurrence

Patients with glioblastoma face a grim prognosis. Despite recent advancement in neurosurgical technology and neuro-oncology glioblastomas almost invariably progress or recur after a median of 4-8 months. The strategy to repeat tumor resection at recurrence in order to minimize tumor load and thus to facilitate subsequent second-line therapy has been shown to be feasible and safe.

However, evidence for a survival benefit of surgery for recurrent glioblastoma is scarce and relies entirely on retrospective analyses. While most retrospective analyses report an apparent survival benefit, an EORTC meta-analysis on second-line therapies found no survival difference in patients with or without surgery at recurrence. With regard to the risks and costs inherent to surgery for glioblastoma, a randomized controlled trial is required.

The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of craniotomy and tumor resection followed by adjuvant second-line therapy to no surgery followed by second-line therapy on overall survival, neurological status, and quality of life. Analysis of overall survival will be used to improve sample size estimation of a subsequent phase III trial for craniotomy and tumor resection of glioblastoma recurrence in cooperation with the EORTC.

Inclusion: Written informed consent; ≥18 years of age; Prior resection of glioblastoma confirmed by histology; Glioblastoma pretreated with standard radiotherapy without or with temozolomide; First progression according to RANO criteria; First progression not within 3 months after completion of radiation therapy; Complete removal of contrast-enhancing lesion considered feasible without significant risk of permanent speech or motor function according to MRI as confirmed by study eligibility committee after screening and prior to recruitment; No encroachment of the M1 or A1 segments of the medial and anterior cerebral artery on MRI; No contrast enhancement in presumed speech and primary motor areas on MRI; No midline shift on MRI; No contrast enhancing ventricular spread, multifocal recurrence, meningeosis carcinomatosa or infiltration of the contra-lateral hemisphere on MRI; No contra-indication for surgery; Good functional status (KPS ≥ 70).

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02394626