Fact CheckerSign in

NCT04797000Active, not recruitingPhase 2

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag in Lower-risk MDS Patients With Platelet Transfusion Dependence

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Japan Local Phase II Clinical Study Comparing Eltrombopag Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Adult Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients With Platelet Transfusion Dependence

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 20 Oct 2026

Brief summary (registry, in English)

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag monotherapy in Japanese adult patients with platelet transfusion-dependent lower-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS).

Status (registry)
Active, not recruiting
Phase (registry)
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36 (actual)
First submitted
4 Mar 2021
Start date
25 May 2021
Primary completion date
26 Apr 2025
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
NCT number
NCT04797000

What you commit to

  • Study type: Interventional · Phase 2
  • Participants enrolled: 36
  • From 25 May 2021 to the primary completion date, 26 Apr 2025
  • 20 sites in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Prior treatment

  • Patients with a history of prior administration of eltrombopag, romiplostim, or other TPO-RA
  • Therapy-related MDS per WHO classification revised 4th edition
  • Currently receiving treatments for MDS (e.g., HMA, cyclosporine A (CsA) or lenalidomide). Supportive treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or erythroid mutation agent in anemic patients or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with severe neutropenia and recurrent infections is allowed if at stable dosage for 3 months prior to screening and continued at the same dosing/schedule until the optimal dose of eltrombopag has been established.
  • Patients scheduled for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Other illness

  • Known history of IPSS-R high or very high risk MDS

Other

  • MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms including chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia per the WHO classification revised 4th edition
  • MDS with excess blasts (EB) per WHO classification revised 4th edition
  • Bone marrow fibrosis that leads to an inability to aspirate adequate bone marrow sample
  • Known thrombophilic risk factors (except in cases where potential benefits of participating in the study outweighed potential risks of thromboembolic events (TEE), as determined by the investigator)
    • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Who the study is looking for

  • Patients diagnosed with MDS according to the WHO classification revised 4th edition by investigator assessment with one of the following prognostic risk categories, based on the International
    • Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R):
  • very low (0-1.5)
  • low (2-3)
  • intermediate risks (3.5-4.5) All following criteria for prognostic variables per IPSS-R should be met.
  • Bone marrow blast \< 5% (per both investigator's assessment and central review)
  • Cytogenetic very good, good or intermediate risk corresponding to IPSS-R
    • Platelet transfusion dependence
    • Refractory, intolerant to, or ineligible for MDS treatments
    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status (PS) 0 or 1

Age in the registry: 20 years to 100 years · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (20)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
AomoriJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Bunkyo KuJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
ChibaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
FukushimaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
GifuJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
IseharaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
KanazawaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
KumamotoJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
KurumeJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
NagasakiJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
NaritaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
NishinomiyaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
OhtakeJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
OsakaJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
SakaiJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
SendaiJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
ShimonosekiJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
tabashi CityJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
YamagataJapanUnknown status
Novartis Investigative Site
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
YokohamaJapanUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.