Comparison of the Performance of ICM and CIED in Detecting AF
Reason given: Recruitment to study was insufficient. This was despite extending the recruitment period. Decision taken to terminate study due to lack of recruitment.
Key facts
- Where
- Oxford, United KingdomSee the site
Where in United Kingdom
- John Radcliffe HospitalOxford, United KingdomNo longer taking part
Trial details
- Who runs it
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Trial code
- NCT04940156
- Record updated
- 15 October 2024
- Original description
The aim of this project is to study the performance of the two most commonly used Implantable Cardiac Monitors in detecting AF episodes and explore how the new connectivity can empower patients and improve patient care.Read full original descriptionShow less
Comparison of the Performance of Implantable Cardiac Monitors and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation
The aim of this project is to study the performance of the two most commonly used Implantable Cardiac Monitors in detecting AF episodes and explore how the new connectivity can empower patients and improve patient care.
Inclusion: Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial; Male or Female; Aged 18 years or above; History of paroxysmal and persistent AF; Dual-chamber pacemaker, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) device with a functioning atrial lead, able to record electrograms and remote monitoring.
Exclusion: Contra-indications for implantable cardiac monitor; Diagnosis of permanent AF; Unable to comply with the follow-up schedule.