Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in NetherlandsNo phase

Tests whether removing pelvic lymph nodes helps men after prostate surgery

Compares prostate surgery with or without lymph node removal in men with prostate cancer.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Dissection In Men With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

Key facts

Where
Amsterdam, NetherlandsSee the site

Where in Netherlands

  • NKI-AVLAmsterdam, NetherlandsTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Trial code
NCT05109910
Record updated
18 November 2021
Original description
An extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is the most accurate staging method to assess the presence of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The therapeutic value, however remains unclear. Prospective randomized trials to address this void are lacking. Since in intermediate and a proportion of high risk PCa the risk of nodal metastases is generally below 25%, the vast majority of men undergo a procedure that has no oncological benefit, but is not without toxicity.Read full original descriptionShow less

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Dissection In Men With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

An extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is the most accurate staging method to assess the presence of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The therapeutic value, however remains unclear. Prospective randomized trials to address this void are lacking. Since in intermediate and a proportion of high risk PCa the risk of nodal metastases is generally below 25%, the vast majority of men undergo a procedure that has no oncological benefit, but is not without toxicity.

Therefore, the investigators aim to compare the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients with an estimated risk of lymph node invasion of 5-20% undergoing a radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without an ePLND.

Inclusion: Male, aged ≥ 18 years; Prostate cancer patients with a Briganti calculated risk of LN metastases of 5-20% without evidence of metastases on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT requiring an ePLND in the standard treatment; Scheduled for a (robot-assisted) laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Written informed consent.

Exclusion: Neoadjuvant hormone deprivation therapy; American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification > 3; Patients with a contradiction for a lymphadenectomy; Absence or withdrawal of an informed consent; Evidence of metastases on pre-operative PSMA PET/CT.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05109910