Sign in
Active, not recruitingNo phase

Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) vs Standard Sizing Strategy TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0)

Key facts

Who runs it
Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
Where
China15 sites in 1 countryChoose a country to see its sites
Trial code
Status
Active, not recruiting
People taking part
206 people, planned
Started
20 Jul 2022
Expected to end
30 May 2031
Type of study
Interventional, 2 groupsOne group gets an existing treatment, for comparison.
Treatments tested
  • TAVR for BAV Using Down Sizing with the Evolut Pro platform
  • TAVR for BAV Using Traditional Sizing strategy with the Evolut Pro platform
Record updated
21 October 2026

Who can take part

Age
60 years and older
Sex
Women and men
Healthy volunteers
Cannot take part

The registry criteria, word for word

Show all 29 criteriaShow less

Who can take part

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Age <65 years and age ≥ 60 years with high surgical risk after combing STS Risk Estimate (≥ 8%), Katz activities of Daily Living, major Organ System Dysfunction and Procedure-Specific Impediment
  • Severe, bicuspid aortic stenosis: Mean gradient ≥40 mmHg OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec OR Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2); if SVi <35mL/m2, low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography is required
  • NYHA classification ≥ II
  • Type 0 (Sievers classification) by MDCT
  • Perimeter-derived annulus diameter ranges from 20.0 mm to 26.0 mm
  • Candidate for Transfemoral TAVR
  • The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) of the respective clinical site

Who cannot take part

  • Any Emergent surgery required before TAVR procedure
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries)
  • Severe mitral stenosis amenable to surgical replacement or repair
  • Previous pacemaker implantation
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [(defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)]
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months (90 days) of the procedure
  • Estimated life expectancy < 12 months (365 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately medicated:aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin; clopidogrel; Nitinol (titanium or nickel); contrast media
  • Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation
  • Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits)
  • Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams
  • Significant aortic disease, including marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma [especially if thick (> 5 mm), protruding or ulcerated] or narrowing (especially with calcification and surface irregularities) of the abdominal or thoracic aorta, severe"unfolding" and horizontal aorta(Annular Angulation>70°)
  • Any contra-indication for Self-expanding bioprosthetic aortic valve deployment Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt< 50,000 cell/mL)
  • Active sepsis, including active bacterial endocarditis with or without treatment
  • Subject refuses a blood transfusion
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM with myocardium more than 1.5cm without an identifiable cause) with obstruction (HOCM)
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Aortic valve type cannot be determined (Sievers classification)
  • Ascending aorta diameter > 50 mm
  • Aortic or iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of the introducer sheath
  • Patient is considered high risk for TAVR by CT corelab, including coronary obstruction, annular rupture and other severe TAVR-Related complications

This trial has no sites in United States.

It has sites in one country. Choose a country to see its sites.

About the trial

What the trial wants to find out

To compare down sizing strategy versus annular sizing strategy technique (control group) in Type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expanding valves (SEVs): a randomized superiority trial

The 2 groups in the trial

  • TAVR with down sizing strategyTreatment being tested

    Balloon sizing will be used during procedural. Pre-dilation with balloon size just below the annular size. 20mm for annular size of 20-23mm. 23mm for annular size 23-26mm. Waist sign with less than mild contrast regurgitation: Evolut PRO Valve one size smaller than manufacturer recommendation and Target implant depth 0-3mm. No waist sign and/or contrast regurgitation or unable to finish supra-annular sizing: Evolut PRO annular sizing (per manufacturer recommendation) with implant depth 0-3mm.

    Treatment: TAVR for BAV Using Down Sizing with the Evolut Pro platform

  • TAVR with standard sizing strategyExisting treatment, for comparison

    Pre-dilation with balloon size just below the annular size. 20mm for annular size of 20-23mm. 23mm for annular size 23-26mm. The prosthesis size of Evolut PRO will be chosen based on manufacturer recommendation. The target implant depth will be 0-3mm.

    Treatment: TAVR for BAV Using Traditional Sizing strategy with the Evolut Pro platform

Data and sources

Registry record
Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Official title
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement For Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0) Using Down Sizing Strategy Compared With Standard Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution): A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Record updated
21 October 2026