Compares mezigdomide with pomalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Tests mezigdomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone against pomalidomide combination in adults with myeloma.
Key facts
- Who runs it
- Celgene
- Where
- Bucharest, Cluj-Napoca, and Iași, RomaniaSee the 3 sitesAlso in 28 other countries, 263 sites
- Trial code
- Registry title
- A Study to Evaluate Mezigdomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- People taking part
- 810 people, planned
- Started
- 20 Sept 2022
- Expected to end
- 30 Nov 2033
- Type of study
- Interventional, 2 groups
- Treatments tested
- mezigdomide
- Pomalidomide
- Bortezomib
- Dexamethasone
- Record updated
- 30 October 2026
Who can take part
AI summary
From the trial's eligibility criteria. Machine-read from the registry text on this page, so it can be wrong. The registry text below and the trial team decide who can take part.
The trial is looking for adults with multiple myeloma that came back or stopped responding to treatment. They must have had 1 to 3 earlier treatments, including lenalidomide.
- Age
- 18 years or older
- Sex
- Men and women can join
- Disease stage
- Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with measurable disease (M-protein ≥ 0.5 g/dL in blood, or ≥ 200 mg per 24-hour urine, or serum free light chain > 100 mg/L with an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio)
- Earlier treatment
- Must have had 1 to 3 earlier lines of myeloma treatment, with at least a minimal response to one of them. Must have had prior lenalidomide. Must not have had mezigdomide or pomalidomide.
Main reasons for not taking part
- Disease got worse during, or within 60 days of, a proteasome inhibitor (some exceptions apply)
- Earlier bortezomib treatment did not bring at least a minimal response, or was stopped because of side effects
- Earlier treatment with mezigdomide or pomalidomide
- Other criteria set by the study protocol
The registry criteria, word for word
Show all 12 criteriaShow less
Who can take part
- Participant has documented diagnosis of MM and measurable disease, defined as any of the following:
- M-protein ≥ 0.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) by serum protein electrophoresis (sPEP) or
- M-protein ≥ 200 milligrams (mg) per 24-hour urine collection by urine protein electrophoresis (uPEP)
- For participants without measurable disease in sPEP or uPEP: serum free light chain (sFLC) levels > 100 mg/L (10 mg/dL) involved light chain and an abnormal kappa/lambda FLC ratio
- Participants received 1 to 3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy
- Participants achieved minimal response [MR] or better to at least 1 prior antimyeloma therapy
Who cannot take part
- Participant has had progression during treatment or within 60 days of the last dose of a proteasome inhibitor, except as noted below:
- Subjects who progressed while being treated with, or within 60 days of last dose of bortezomib maintenance given once every 2 weeks (or less frequently) are not excluded
- Participants who progressed while being treated with ixazomib monotherapy maintenance ≥ 6 months prior to the time of starting study treatment are not excluded
- For participants with prior treatment of a bortezomib containing regimen, the best response achieved was not a minimal response (MR) or better, or participant discontinued bortezomib due to toxicity
- Participant has had prior treatment with mezigdomide or pomalidomide
- Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply
Check if you might fit
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Which of these best describes your myeloma treatment so far?
- Have you ever taken lenalidomide (also called Revlimid), a tablet medicine for myeloma?
- Has a doctor told you that your myeloma can be measured in your blood or urine tests?
Where in Romania
Also in 28 other countries, 263 sites
- BucharestHospital not named in the registryNo longer taking part
- Cluj-NapocaHospital not named in the registryNo longer taking part
- IașiHospital not named in the registryNo longer taking part
About the trial
What the trial wants to find out
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of mezigdomide (CC-92480), bortezomib and dexamethasone (MeziVd) versus pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received between 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy and who have had prior lenalidomide exposure.
The 2 groups in the trial
- MeziVd (mezigdomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone)Treatment being tested
Treatment: mezigdomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone
- PVd (pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone)Treatment being tested
Treatment: Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations
Print a page for my doctorData and sources
- Registry record
- Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Two-Stage, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study Comparing Mezigdomide (CC-92480), Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): SUCCESSOR-1
- Plain-language title
- Compares mezigdomide with pomalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myelomaGenerated from the registry record. The registry title is the official one.
- AI summary
- From the trial's eligibility criteria. Read by machine on 12 November 2026.
- Fit questions
- Built from NCT05519085, who can take part
- Record updated
- 30 October 2026