Fact CheckerSign in

NCT05568927Completed

Validation of SEARCH, a Novel Hierarchical Algorithm to Define Long-term Outcomes After Pulmonary Embolism

An Observational Cohort Study to Validate SEARCH, a Novel Hierarchical Algorithm to Define Long-term Outcomes After Pulmonary Embolism

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Last updated 4 Nov 2025

Brief summary (registry, in English)

Potential outcomes after PE occur on a spectrum: complete recovery, exercise intolerance from deconditioning/anxiety, dyspnea from concomitant cardiopulmonary conditions, dyspnea from residual pulmonary vascular occlusion, chronic thromboembolic disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Although a battery of advanced diagnostic tests could distinguish each of those conditions, the yield of individual tests among all post- PE patients is low enough that routine testing of all PE patients is not typically performed. Although the various possible post-PE outcomes have enormous implications for patient care, they are rarely distinguished clinically. Perhaps for this reason, chronic conditions after PE are rarely (if ever) used as endpoints in randomized clinical trials of acute PE treatment. The proposed project will validate a clinical decision tree to distinguish among the various discrete outcomes cost-effectively through a hierarchical series of tests with the acronym SEARCH (for symptom screen, exercise function, arterial perfusion, resting heart function, confirmatory imaging and hemodynamics). Each step of the algorithm sorts a subset of patients into a diagnostic category unequivocally in a cost-effective manner. The categories are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, so that each case falls into one, and only one, category. Each individual test used in the algorithm has been clinically validated in pulmonary embolism patients, including the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) technique that the investigators developed and validated. However, the decision tree approach to deploying the tests has not yet been validated. Aim 1 will determine whether the SEARCH algorithm will yield concordant post-PE diagnoses when multiple reviewers independently evaluate multiple cases (reliability). Aim 2 will determine whether the post-PE diagnoses are stable, according to the SEARCH algorithm, between the first evaluation and the subsequent one six months later (validity).

Status (registry)
Completed
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
150 (actual)
First submitted
28 Sept 2022
Start date
15 Nov 2022
Primary completion date
13 Jun 2025
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Diego
NCT number
NCT05568927

What you commit to

  • Study type: Observational
  • Participants enrolled: 150
  • From 15 Nov 2022 to the primary completion date, 13 Jun 2025
  • 8 sites in 1 country
  • Visits and tests: ask the trial team, the registry does not list them

Built from the registry fields of ClinicalTrials.gov. It describes the study, not your situation.

Who cannot take part

Copied verbatim from ClinicalTrials.gov and grouped by topic. Only the trial team decides who can take part.

Other

  • ● Cases in which the clinical presentations contain insufficient interpretable data to permit evaluation of SEARCH criteria, as described in the Study Design section, will be excluded from the analysis.

Who the study is looking for

  • age 18 years or greater
  • objective evidence of acute pulmonary thrombo-embolism at least six months before the evaluation
  • anticipated survival for at least three months
  • a diagnostic endpoint in the SEARCH algorithm has been reached.

Age in the registry: 18 years to - · Sex: All · Does not accept healthy volunteers

Full criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov

Sites (8)

Sites in registry order. Pick your city on the disease page to sort them by distance.

SiteCityCountrySite status
University of California San Francisco-Fresno
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
FresnoUnited StatesUnknown status
University of California, Irvine
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
IrvineUnited StatesUnknown status
University of California, Los Angeles
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Los AngelesUnited StatesUnknown status
University Hospital, Riverside
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
Moreno ValleyUnited StatesUnknown status
University of California - Davis
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
SacramentoUnited StatesUnknown status
University of California San Diego
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
San DiegoUnited StatesUnknown status
University of California San Francisco
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
San FranciscoUnited StatesUnknown status
University of California, Los Angeles - Harbor
Coordinator of this site? Confirm its status
TorranceUnited StatesUnknown status

This page is information, not medical advice. Discuss any trial with your doctor.