Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in DenmarkNo phase

Kidney artery stenting versus sham procedure in high-risk renal artery stenosis

Tests a kidney artery stent against a sham procedure in high-risk adults.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis in High-Risk Patients.

Key facts

Where
Aarhus N, Copenhagen, and Odense C, DenmarkSee the 3 sites

Where in Denmark

  • Aarhus University HospitalAarhus N, DenmarkTaking people
  • RigshospitaletCopenhagen, DenmarkTaking people
  • Odense University HospitalOdense C, DenmarkTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
University of Aarhus
Trial code
NCT05834803
Record updated
4 November 2026
Original description
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) with stent placement of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is beneficial in high-risk patients selected according to the criteria used in the DAN-PTRAI study. The main questions the trial aims to answer are whether renal artery stenting in addition to optimal medical therapy, compared with a sham procedure and optimal medical therapy, has beneficial effects on:Read full original descriptionShow less

Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis in High-Risk Patients - a Danish Nationwide Randomized Sham-Controlled Study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) with stent placement of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is beneficial in high-risk patients selected according to the criteria used in the DAN-PTRAI study. The main questions the trial aims to answer are whether renal artery stenting in addition to optimal medical therapy, compared with a sham procedure and optimal medical therapy, has beneficial effects on:

* Blood pressure (primary outcome: 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 6 months) * Kidney function * Hospitalizations for heart failure

Inclusion: One or more severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenoses defined as a stenosis ≥70% by catheter-based angiography; In addition, at least one of the following high-risk clinical syndromes:; Resistant hypertension with average 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥150 mmHg despite ≥3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, if tolerated, and each prescribed at optimal doses; Rapidly declining kidney function with a reduction in estimated GFR of >5 mL/min per 1.73m2 per year and average 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg despite ≥3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, if tolerated, and each prescribed at optimal doses; Hospital admissions with acute decompensated heart failure (≥2 hospitalizations for heart failure or ≥1 hospitalization for sudden, "flash" pulmonary edema) with no obvious explanations such as nonadherence, left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, or valvular heart disease and average 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg despite ≥3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, if tolerated, and each prescribed at optimal doses; All 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements are performed after nurse-administered medication.

Exclusion: Fibromuscular dysplasia or other non-atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis known to be present prior to randomization; Previous kidney transplant; Previous PTRA with stent placement; Presence of a renal artery stenosis not amenable for treatment with a stent; Intolerance to any antithrombotic treatment; Patients who are not eligible for randomization but treated with renal artery stenting outside the protocol are followed according to the DAN-PTRAII protocol in order to account for all PTRA treatments performed in Denmark in the study period; Patients treated with renal artery stenting without randomization in the study period include patients with:; Treatment-resistant heart failure episodes presumed caused by renovascular disease; Rapidly declining kidney function/acute kidney failure approaching the need for dialysis presumed caused by renovascular disease; Treatment-resistant heart failure episodes presumed caused by renovascular disease; Rapidly declining kidney function/acute kidney failure approaching the need for dialysis presumed caused by renovascular disease; At least one of the listed high-risk clinical syndromes AND one or more significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenoses defined as a stenosis of 50-69% by catheter-based angiography with:; a mean translesional gradient of ≥10 mmHg, or; a systolic translesional gradient of ≥20 mmHg, or; a renal fractional flow reserve (Pd/Pa) of ≤0.80; Unable to provide informed consent; Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status in female of childbearing potential; Kidney size <7 cm (pole to pole length) supplied by target vessel.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05834803