Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in FranceNo phase

Comparing two pacemaker placements in patients with fast atrial fibrillation

Compares left bundle branch pacing with right ventricular pacing in adults with fast atrial fibrillation.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Benefit of Permanent Stimulation of the Left Branch of the His Bundle Versus Right Ventricular Stimulation After Atrioventricular Node Ablation for Rapid Atrial Fibrillation

Key facts

Where
Caen, FranceSee the site

Where in France

  • CHU de CAENCaen, FranceTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
University Hospital, Rouen
Trial code
NCT06061978
Record updated
10 February 2026
Original description
The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional benefit of left bundle branch of His pacing compared to right ventricular pacing in patients implanted with a pacemaker prior to a atrioventricular node ablation procedure for rapid atrial fibrillationRead full original descriptionShow less

Benefit of Permanent Stimulation of the Left Branch of the His Bundle Versus Right Ventricular Stimulation After Atrioventricular Node Ablation for Rapid Atrial Fibrillation

The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional benefit of left bundle branch of His pacing compared to right ventricular pacing in patients implanted with a pacemaker prior to a atrioventricular node ablation procedure for rapid atrial fibrillation

Inclusion: 1/ Pacemaker implanted patient with LBTP lead and back-up right ventricular lead who subsequently underwent successful atrioventricular node ablation for rapid AF 2) NAV ablation procedure performed less than 15 days ago 3) Age ≥ 18 years 4) Woman of childbearing age with effective contraception (estrogen-progestin or intrauterine device or tubal ligation) for at least 1 month and for the duration of the study, and a negative urine pregnancy test by B-HCG at inclusion Or, Postmenopausal woman: confirmatory diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months prior to the inclusion visit); Membership of a social security scheme 6) Patient follow-up feasible 7) Patient has read and understood the information leaflet and signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion: Impairment of autonomy such that a maximal cardiorespiratory effort test (VO2 Max test) cannot be performed under good conditions (ADL scale < 5); Any history of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol, or from giving informed consent; LVEF < 40% at inclusion; Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision, or person under court protection, sub-guardianship or curatorship; Patient participating in another interventional trial; Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women, or those without proven contraception.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06061978