Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in BelgiumNo phase

Compares surgical removal and tissue sampling for aggressive brain tumors in older adults

Compares tumor removal with tumor biopsy in adults with glioblastoma, a brain tumor.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: The RESBIOP-study: Resection Versus Biopsy in High-grade Glioma Patients (ENCRAM 2202)

Key facts

Where
Leuven, BelgiumSee the site

Could this be for you?

Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.

  • Are you between 18 and 90 years old?

Source: NCT06146725, who can take part

Where in Belgium

  • University Hospital LeuvenLeuven, BelgiumTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
Jasper Gerritsen
Trial code
NCT06146725
Record updated
27 November 2023
Original description
There are no guidelines or prospective studies defining the optimal surgical treatment for gliomas of older patients (≥70 years) or those with limited functioning performance at presentation (KPS ≤70). Therefore, the decision between resection and biopsy is varied, amongst neurosurgeons internationally and at times even within an instiutition. This study aims to compare the effects of maximal tumor resection versus tissue biopsy on survival, functional, neurological, and quality of life outcomes in these patient subgroups. Furthermore, it evaluates which modality would maximize the potential to undergo adjuvant treatment.Read full original descriptionShow less

The RESBIOP-study: Resection Versus Biopsy in High-grade Glioma Patients (ENCRAM 2202)

There are no guidelines or prospective studies defining the optimal surgical treatment for gliomas of older patients (≥70 years) or those with limited functioning performance at presentation (KPS ≤70). Therefore, the decision between resection and biopsy is varied, amongst neurosurgeons internationally and at times even within an instiutition. This study aims to compare the effects of maximal tumor resection versus tissue biopsy on survival, functional, neurological, and quality of life outcomes in these patient subgroups. Furthermore, it evaluates which modality would maximize the potential to undergo adjuvant treatment.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective, 2-arm cohort study of observational nature. Consecutive HGG patients will be treated with resection or biopsy at a 3:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS) and 2) proportion of patients that have received adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints are 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery 2) progression-free survival (PFS); 3) quality of life at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.

Inclusion: Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years; Tumor diagnosed as HGG (WHO grade III/IV) on MRI as assessed by the neurosurgeon; Written informed consent.

Exclusion: Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma; Second primary malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of any organ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin; Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem or midline; Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g. pacemaker); Inability to give written informed consent.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06146725