Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in DenmarkNo phase

Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Training After Ischemic Stroke

Compares robot-assisted training with standard training in adults with ischemic stroke.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Robot-Assisted Training Versus Standard Training in Ischemic Stroke

Key facts

Where
Copenhagen and Odense, DenmarkSee the 2 sites

Where in Denmark

  • Rigshospitalet and Herlev Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen, DenmarkNot yet recruiting
  • Odense University HospitalOdense, DenmarkTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
Odense University Hospital
Trial code
NCT06273475
Record updated
20 November 2025
Original description
The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) nested in a prospective cohort, is to investigate the superior effect of late-phase robot-assisted versus standard training on motor function, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in a moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke population following subacute rehabilitation.Read full original descriptionShow less

The Effect of Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Training on Motor Function Following Subacute Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke - a Randomised Controlled Trial Nested in a Prospective Cohort.

The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) nested in a prospective cohort, is to investigate the superior effect of late-phase robot-assisted versus standard training on motor function, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in a moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke population following subacute rehabilitation.

The main hypothesis of the study is:

Robot-assisted training has a superior effect on motor function (Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment; primary outcome), physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke-affected individuals in comparison to standard training.

Inclusion:; Ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke; Chronic state (6-24 months post-stroke); Subacute rehabilitation terminated (subacute phase defined as until 6 months post-stroke); Moderately-severely impaired:; Modified Rankin Scale Score 3-5; Scandinavian Stroke Scale Leg Motor Function Score 0-4 and/or SSS gait function 0-9; Approved by referring doctor; Exclusion:; Prior SAH; Infarct located in the cerebellum or brain stem; Severe fatigue making study completion improbable; Cognitive deficits impeding study participation; Inability to walk independently pre-stroke; Recurrence of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular accidents; Pre-existing neurological diseases or ongoing cancer treatment; Refusing group allocation; Concurrent participation in another clinical trial potentially interacting with the present trial.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06273475