Comparing two physical therapy methods for trunk control after ischemic stroke
Compares two physical therapy techniques for trunk control in adults with ischemic stroke.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization vs Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Stroke Patients
Key facts
- Where
- Lahore, PakistanSee the site
Could this be for you?
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 40 and 65 years old?
Source: NCT06459388, who can take part
Where in Pakistan
- Lahore General HospitalLahore, PakistanTaking people
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- Riphah International University
- Trial code
- NCT06459388
- Record updated
- 27 December 2024
- Original description
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patients. The main question it aims to answer is:Read full original descriptionShow less
Effects of Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Trunk Control, Postural Stability and Mobility in Stroke Patients
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patients. The main question it aims to answer is:
Is there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patients?
Researchers will compare stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization to pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation to see if there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patient.
Participants will be divided into two groups:
Group A will receive stabilizing reversals and rhythmic reversals technique. The patient will perform 3 sets with 15 repetitions in each session, 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Group B will receive Pelvic PNF protocol. The treatment protocol will be followed 5 days a week for 8 weeks (i.e. 20 sessions) and each session will last for 30 minutes.
Inclusion: Diagnosed cases of ischemic stroke; Both genders of stroke patients; Age of stroke patients between 40-65 years; Duration of stroke less than 6 months; Participants should be able to understand and follow simple verbal commands (MMSE; 24).
Exclusion: Recurrent history of stroke; Recent history of any trauma; Musculoskeletal disorders such as low back pain, arthritis, degenerative diseases of the lower limbs affecting motor performance, spinal deformity and contractures; Spasticity (modified Ashworth scale grade ≥3) or flaccidity in lower limbs and upper limbs; PNF treatment given to the pelvic region within 6 weeks.