Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Taking people in Hong KongNo phase

Testing Magnetic Stimulation Intensity to Aid Arm Recovery After Stroke

Tests brain stimulation intensity levels in stroke patients with weakened arm movement.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Priming Theta Burst Stimulation for Stroke: A Study of Intensity

Key facts

Where
Hong Kong, Hong KongSee the site

Could this be for you?

Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.

  • Are you between 18 and 80 years old?

Source: NCT06509789, who can take part

Where in Hong Kong

  • Jack Jiaqi ZhangHong Kong, Hong KongTaking people

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Trial code
NCT06509789
Record updated
24 August 2026
Original description
Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.Read full original descriptionShow less

Optimizing the Intensity of Priming Theta Burst Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Functions After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.

Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.

Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.

Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).

Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.

Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.

Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.

Inclusion: Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction caused by ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, with stroke onset≥6 months. Diagnosis will be verified using discharge summary and radiological reports issued by Hospital Authority. Qualifying participants will undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience (UBSN) at PolyU to further confirm their lesion location in the period of experimental participation; Age between 18 and 80 years; Residual upper limb functions between levels 2-7 in the FTHUE, indicating moderately-to-severely impaired upper limb motor functions; Capable of providing informed written consent. Exclusion Criteria; Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:; any contraindications to TMS (screened by the safety checklist by Rossi(33)) and/or MRI (screened by the MRI safety checklist offered by UBSN [see supplement]); Diagnosed with any concomitant neurological disease other than stroke; signs of cognitive impairment, with a Montreal cognitive assessment score<21/22 out of 30 (34); Severe spasticity in the hemiparetic upper limb muscles, with a Modified Ashworth score > 2 (35).

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06509789