Tests magnesium in children with severe acute asthma in emergency care

Trial details

Who runs it

Suzanne Schuh

Trial code

NCT06785272

Record updated

18 December 2025

Original description

Despite optimal initial emergency department (ED) therapy, 50% of children with severe acute asthma have ongoing moderate-severe respiratory distress. Guidelines recommend intravenous magnesium (IVMg) for them, yet evidence for IVMg efficacy is scant and disparate. While early small Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) suggested hospitalization benefit, recent large observational studies found no association between IVMg and improved outcomes. IVMg therapy is resource-intensive, can cause hypotension and demands close monitoring. Previous RCTs only assessed early Mg effect at 1-2 hours, overlooked the peak effect of key co-interventions such as corticosteroids and did not use validated scores. IVMg use is variable and often delayed until ≥4 hours after ED therapy is started and after the hospitalization decision has been made. Thus, in observational studies children given IVMg are 6-10 times more likely to be hospitalized; these studies have major confounding and the true IVMg treatment effect is thus unknown. To conclusively determine if IVMg alters the exacerbation course, it must be given early, and the primary outcome measure should be the severity of respiratory distress measured at the peak effect of key co-interventions to focus on a clinically meaningful and objective effect. The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM)-a valid, discriminative, reproducible and responsive-to-change instrument-is thus the ideal primary outcome measure. Hospitalization outcome has major confounding by indication and MD perceptions.Read full original descriptionShow less

Magnesium Trial in Acute Asthma in Emergency Department

Despite optimal initial emergency department (ED) therapy, 50% of children with severe acute asthma have ongoing moderate-severe respiratory distress. Guidelines recommend intravenous magnesium (IVMg) for them, yet evidence for IVMg efficacy is scant and disparate. While early small Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) suggested hospitalization benefit, recent large observational studies found no association between IVMg and improved outcomes. IVMg therapy is resource-intensive, can cause hypotension and demands close monitoring. Previous RCTs only assessed early Mg effect at 1-2 hours, overlooked the peak effect of key co-interventions such as corticosteroids and did not use validated scores. IVMg use is variable and often delayed until ≥4 hours after ED therapy is started and after the hospitalization decision has been made. Thus, in observational studies children given IVMg are 6-10 times more likely to be hospitalized; these studies have major confounding and the true IVMg treatment effect is thus unknown. To conclusively determine if IVMg alters the exacerbation course, it must be given early, and the primary outcome measure should be the severity of respiratory distress measured at the peak effect of key co-interventions to focus on a clinically meaningful and objective effect. The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM)-a valid, discriminative, reproducible and responsive-to-change instrument-is thus the ideal primary outcome measure. Hospitalization outcome has major confounding by indication and MD perceptions.

Primary Aim: In children with acute asthma remaining in moderate-severe distress after 1 hour of initial ED therapy, is early IVMg therapy associated with a significantly greater improvement in respiratory distress, measured by PRAM, at 2 hours after starting the intervention, compared to placebo? Hypothesis: IVMg will yield significantly greater PRAM improvement of ≥1.0 point than placebo.

Expected Outcomes: This trial will clarify if there is an incremental benefit of IVMg in decreasing respiratory distress in pediatric refractory acute asthma. A positive result will establish a proven standard of care for this indication, with a need for Knowledge Translation (KT) to implement routine early IVMg therapy. A negative result will lead to de-implementation of IVMg which may also lead to cost savings.

Inclusion: Age 2.00-17.99 years (prior to 18th birthday),; Diagnosis of asthma, defined as an asthma or probable asthma diagnosis/asthma-like phenotype made by a physician (this includes ED physician) in a patient who in the opinion of the treating ED physician requires therapy for acute asthma in the ED (GINA asthma guidelines, 2024); Moderate-severe asthma after initial therapy with 3 treatments of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium, defined as an eligibility PRAM ≥5, indicating a strong association with hospitalization.

Exclusion: Receipt of IVMg within 24 hours prior to ED arrival; Need for airway support on arrival. (Airway support on arrival meeting exclusion criteria will include immediate need for high flow nasal cannula therapy, non-invasive CPAP/bi-PAP ventilation or invasive ventilation with endotracheal intubation, as decided by the attending Emergency Department (ED) physician. Supplemental oxygen therapy will not represent an exclusion criterion.); Previous enrollment; Known renal, chronic pulmonary, neurologic, cardiac or systemic disease: these may influence outcomes after Mg; Known hypersensitivity to Mg sulfate; Poor mastery of English and/or French language precluding informed consent understanding; No phone/email; unavailable for follow-up.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06785272