Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Not yet taking people in Hong KongNo phase

Compares two ways to look inside the stomach for anaemia in heart attack patients

Compares a swallowed camera capsule with endoscopy in people with anaemia and acute coronary syndrome.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: the MCCE vs EGD Trial

Key facts

Where
Hong Kong, Hong KongSee the site

Where in Hong Kong

  • Prince of Wales HospitalHong Kong, Hong KongNo longer taking part

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Trial code
NCT07004530
Record updated
4 June 2025
Original description
Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.Read full original descriptionShow less

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs Esophago-gastro-Duodenoscopy as The Initial Investigation for Anaemia in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (the MCCE vs EGD Trial) - a Single Centre Randomized Study

Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.

Inclusion: subjects are patients older than 18 years old with:; the diagnosis of ACS as defined by symptoms of chest pain or shortness-of-breath, abnormal electrocardiogram and positive enzyme, requiring coronary intervention; new-onset anaemia as defined by Hb<11 g/dL on admission blood taking.

Exclusion: History of active haematological disease including hemoglobinopathies such as thalassemia, Myelodysplastic syndromes, haematological malignancy, aplastic anaemia, or autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; Patients with known active gastrointestinal malignancy; Contraindications for CE: suspected or known gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis, fistula, diverticula, presence of gastrointestinal obstruction symptoms such as pain or dysphagia; inoperative conditions or refusal to undergo abdominal surgery if required; history of laparotomy, gastric or bowel surgery; presence of metallic implants that is not MRI conditional; Contraindications for EGD: Possible gastrointestinal perforation, medically unstable patients, patient with known pharyngeal diverticulum, and patients with recent head and neck trauma; Inability to take 1-month DAPT such as non-deferrable surgery within 1 months, severe allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors, or patients in whom 1 months DAPT is not indicated; Patients who are in active heart failure or fluid-overload state; Patients who have chronic renal failure as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min/1.73m2; Patients whose life-expectancy is less than 6 months; Patients who are pregnant or lactating; Patients who are unable to give informed consent.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07004530