3D-Printed Splints Compared With Standard Splints for Arm Recovery After Stroke
Compares 3D-printed and conventional splints for arm recovery in adults with chronic stroke.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Evaluating Functional Outcomes of 3D-Printed Splints in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Recovery
Key facts
- Where
- Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaSee the site
Where in Saudi Arabia
- Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian CityRiyadh, Saudi ArabiaNo longer taking part
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- King Saud University
- Trial code
- NCT07243314
- Record updated
- 21 November 2025
- Original description
This study aims to evaluate the upper limb motor recovery using a 3D-printed dynamic orthosis compared to a conventional one as part of a rehabilitation program in individuals with chronic stroke.Read full original descriptionShow less
Evaluating Functional Outcomes of 3D-Printed Splints in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Recovery
This study aims to evaluate the upper limb motor recovery using a 3D-printed dynamic orthosis compared to a conventional one as part of a rehabilitation program in individuals with chronic stroke.
The main question it seeks to answer:
Which type of dynamic splint (3D-printed or traditional), combined with the task-oriented therapy program, leads to greater improvement in affected upper-limb function, patient satisfaction, and usability in stroke patients? Researchers will compare these two types of dynamic splints.
Participants will:
Receive 20 sessions of task-oriented therapy combined with either a 3D-printed dynamic splint or a traditional dynamic splint.
Visit the clinic five times a week for a period of four weeks. Undergo assessments before and after the 4-week program.
Inclusion: Over 18 years old; Chronic stroke; Upper limb hemiparalysis; Ability to understand and follow orders and able to provide informed consent (Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) > 24); Upper-limb mild to moderate spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale 1+ to 3 at the wrist); Not participating in other clinical or research studies at the same time.
Exclusion: Had deficits in language or cognitive impairments that were likely to interfere with their cooperation in the study; Deformity or presented with severe upper-limb contractures; Inability to commit to the time requirement of the protocol; Unilateral neglect.