Effects of MWM Vs Sustained Mobilization on Knee Osteoarthritis
This trial has no sites in United States.
It has sites in one country. Choose a country to see its sites.
Could this be for you?
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 45 and 70 years old?
Source: NCT07315464, who can take part
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations
Print a page for my doctorTrial details
- Who runs it
- Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
- Trial code
- NCT07315464
- Record updated
- 2 January 2026
- Original description
This article focused on people diagnosed with grade III Knee OA with sample size of 68 patients , who will randomly divided into two groups . Group A received Mulligan's MWM while group B received Kaltenborn's Sustained Mobilization along with eccentric exercises. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment conditions in reducing knee pain and improving joint function decreasing disability in daily activities. The patients followed a structured treatment plan over a set period and outcomes will measured using reliable clinical tools such as NPRS for pain KOOS for functional disability and Goniometer for ROM.Read full original descriptionShow less
Effects of Mobilization With Movement Versus Sustained Mobilization Along With Eccentric Exercises on Pain & Functional Disability in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
This article focused on people diagnosed with grade III Knee OA with sample size of 68 patients , who will randomly divided into two groups . Group A received Mulligan's MWM while group B received Kaltenborn's Sustained Mobilization along with eccentric exercises. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment conditions in reducing knee pain and improving joint function decreasing disability in daily activities. The patients followed a structured treatment plan over a set period and outcomes will measured using reliable clinical tools such as NPRS for pain KOOS for functional disability and Goniometer for ROM.
Inclusion: Age between 45 and 70 years Both male and female patients with a history of knee osteoarthritis were selectedfor this study. Clinically and radiologically diagnosed with Grade III Knee Osteoarthritis (basedon Kellgren and Lawrence scale); Meets ACR criteria for knee OA.
Exclusion: History of knee or lower limb surgery Received corticosteroid injections (oral or intra-articular) in the past 6 months Other musculoskeletal conditions in the lower limb(e.g., fracture, bursitis, back pain with radiating symptoms) Diagnosed with inflammatory joint diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout) Neurological conditions affecting lower limbs (e.g., stroke, neuropathy) BMI > 35 (severe obesity) that limits safe participation in exercises Any contraindications to manual therapy (e.g., malignancy, infection, unstablejoint).