Comparing Remote and In-Person Rehabilitation for Thinking Skills After Stroke
Compares remote rehabilitation with in-person rehabilitation for thinking problems in stroke survivors.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Tele-Rehabilitation vs Conventional Rehabilitation for Cognitive Improvement in Stroke Survivors.
Key facts
- Where
- Islamabad, PakistanSee the site
AI summary: who the study is looking for
From the trial's eligibility criteria. Machine-read from the registry text on this page, so it can be wrong. The registry text below and the trial team decide who can take part.
The trial is looking for adults aged 50 to 80 who had a stroke and have some problems with thinking and memory. It compares rehabilitation by video or phone with usual in-person rehabilitation.
- Age
- 50 to 80 years
- Sex
- All sexes can join.
- Disease stage
- Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) in the subacute to chronic phase, with a MoCA score of 10 to 25.
Main reasons for not taking part
- History of a neurodegenerative disorder, such as Alzheimer's Disease or Parkinson's Disease
- Severe cognitive impairment
- No access to a digital device, or unable to use one
Read by machine on 12 November 2026.
Could this be for you?
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 50 and 80 years old?
Source: NCT07504276, who can take part
Where in Pakistan
- Riphah International UniversityIslamabad, PakistanContact: Imran Amjad, PhdTaking people
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations
Print a page for my doctorTrial details
- Who runs it
- Riphah International University
- Trial code
- NCT07504276
- Record updated
- 3 April 2026
- Original description
This study aims to:Read full original descriptionShow less
Comparison Of Tele-Rehabilitation Versus Conventional Rehabilitation To Improve Cognition Among Stroke Survivor.
This study aims to:
* Compare tele-rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation for cognitive improvement after stroke. * Evaluate changes in cognitive function using standardized assessment tools. * Determine whether tele-rehabilitation is as effective as conventional therapy. * Improve evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors.
Inclusion: Adults with age 50-80; Diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within subacute to chronic phase; Moca Score 10-25 score atleast; For tele-rehab must accessible to a digital device.
Exclusion: History of neurodegenerative disorder e.g Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease; Severe Cognitive Impairment; Lack of access to or inability to use a digital device.