Comparing Remote and In-Person Rehabilitation for Thinking Skills After Stroke
Compares remote rehabilitation with in-person rehabilitation for thinking problems in stroke survivors.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Tele-Rehabilitation vs Conventional Rehabilitation for Cognitive Improvement in Stroke Survivors.
Key facts
- Where
- Islamabad, PakistanSee the site
Could this be for you?
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 50 and 80 years old?
Source: NCT07504276, who can take part
Where in Pakistan
- Riphah International UniversityIslamabad, PakistanTaking people
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- Riphah International University
- Trial code
- NCT07504276
- Record updated
- 3 April 2026
- Original description
This study aims to:Read full original descriptionShow less
Comparison Of Tele-Rehabilitation Versus Conventional Rehabilitation To Improve Cognition Among Stroke Survivor.
This study aims to:
* Compare tele-rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation for cognitive improvement after stroke. * Evaluate changes in cognitive function using standardized assessment tools. * Determine whether tele-rehabilitation is as effective as conventional therapy. * Improve evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors.
Inclusion: Adults with age 50-80; Diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within subacute to chronic phase; Moca Score 10-25 score atleast; For tele-rehab must accessible to a digital device.
Exclusion: History of neurodegenerative disorder e.g Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease; Severe Cognitive Impairment; Lack of access to or inability to use a digital device.