Comparing in-clinic and online arm rehabilitation after stroke
Compares constraint-induced movement therapy given in clinic or online for arm weakness after stroke.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Comparative Effects of Telerehabilitation and Clinic Based Constraint Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Limb Function in Sub-Acute Stroke Patients
Key facts
- Where
- Faisalabad, PakistanSee the site
Could this be for you?
Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.
- Are you between 40 and 70 years old?
Source: NCT07604181, who can take part
Where in Pakistan
- Madinah Teaching HospitalFaisalabad, PakistanTaking people
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- University of Faisalabad
- Trial code
- NCT07604181
- Record updated
- 22 May 2026
- Original description
Stroke constitutes a principal cause of chronic neurological disability globally, frequently precipitating profound upper limb motor impairment that compromises functional autonomy and overall quality of life. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) represents a rigorously validated neurorehabilitation paradigm grounded in the doctrine of experience-dependent neuroplasticity, promoting cortical reorganization through enforced utilization of the paretic limb while restraining the unaffected extremity. By counteracting learned non-use and emphasizing high- intensity, task-specific training, CIMT substantially augments motor recovery and functional performance. The primary objective of the present study is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of CIMT delivery-clinic-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation-in individuals with stroke. A total of 28 participants will be recruited through a non-probability consecutive sampling technique in accordance with explicitly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and will subsequently be randomized into two equal groups (n = 14 per group) using the chit-and-draw method to ensure unbiased allocation. Group A will receive CIMT within a clinical setting under direct supervision, whereas Group B will undergo an equivalent intervention via a structured online telerehabilitation platform under complete supervision. The intervention will be administered to both groups for duration of eight weeks. Outcome measures will include the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to comprehensively evaluate upper limb motor function and spasticity. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and at the completion of the eight-week intervention period.Read full original descriptionShow less
Comparative Effects of Telerehabilitation and Clinic Based Constraint Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Limb Function in Sub-Acute Stroke Patients
Stroke constitutes a principal cause of chronic neurological disability globally, frequently precipitating profound upper limb motor impairment that compromises functional autonomy and overall quality of life. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) represents a rigorously validated neurorehabilitation paradigm grounded in the doctrine of experience-dependent neuroplasticity, promoting cortical reorganization through enforced utilization of the paretic limb while restraining the unaffected extremity. By counteracting learned non-use and emphasizing high- intensity, task-specific training, CIMT substantially augments motor recovery and functional performance. The primary objective of the present study is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of CIMT delivery-clinic-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation-in individuals with stroke. A total of 28 participants will be recruited through a non-probability consecutive sampling technique in accordance with explicitly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and will subsequently be randomized into two equal groups (n = 14 per group) using the chit-and-draw method to ensure unbiased allocation. Group A will receive CIMT within a clinical setting under direct supervision, whereas Group B will undergo an equivalent intervention via a structured online telerehabilitation platform under complete supervision. The intervention will be administered to both groups for duration of eight weeks. Outcome measures will include the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to comprehensively evaluate upper limb motor function and spasticity. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and at the completion of the eight-week intervention period.
Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.
Inclusion: Diagnosed cases of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. 2. Age between 40-70 years. 3. Both male and female. 4. Presented with stroke for once in a life and in a period of 6 months post stroke; Patient should not have any history of rehabilitation in his/her 6 months post stroke period. 6. Medically stable condition. 7. Ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions. 8. Minimum active wrist and finger extension required to participate in CIMT.
Exclusion: Severe cognitive impairment. 2. Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score \>3). 3. Other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders affecting upper limb function; Severe aphasia limiting effective communication. 5. Any other musculoskeletal deficits interfering with task performance. 6. Uncontrolled systemic medical conditions. 7. No attendant's support the session. 8. Depression that restrains participant to cooperate during the session.