Sign in
Taking people in United StatesNo phase

Experimental Evidence of the Impact of Parental Income on Child Mental Health and Neuroimmune Function

Key facts

Who runs it
Northwestern University
Where
Evanston, United StatesSee the site
Trial code
Status
Recruiting
People taking part
500 people, planned
Started
4 Apr 2026
Expected to end
31 Aug 2029
Type of study
Interventional, 2 groups
Treatments tested
  • Psychological fMRI task
Record updated
11 June 2026

Who can take part

Age
10 years to 18 years
Sex
Women and men
Healthy volunteers
Cannot take part

The registry criteria, word for word

Show all 5 criteriaShow less

Who can take part

  • Child of a participant enrolled in the Every Dollar Counts intervention. Youth were between ages 5 and 14 at the start of the intervention (followed up when ages 10 to 18)
  • Biological parent who lives with the child must be part of the original income study
  • For the in-person neuroimaging subsample: family must live within a 2-hour drive of downtown Chicago

Who cannot take part

  • Parent not enrolled in the Every Dollar Counts program
  • Youth not between ages 5 and 14 at the start of the intervention

Check if you might fit

Answer for yourself. This is not a decision: only the study team can say whether you can take part.

  • Are you between 10 and 18 years old?

Where in United States

  • Northwestern UniversityEvanston, United StatesContact: Cary R NusslockTaking people

About the trial

What the trial wants to find out

Growing up in a lower-income family robustly predicts worse mental health in adolescence and early adulthood. How does variability in family income "get under the skin" of the developing child and via what mechanisms does it increase risk for mental illness? Moreover, could supplements to family income at critical developmental periods help to prevent later youth mental illness? To address these questions, we leverage an innovative existing double blind randomized controlled trial of 3-years of substantial income supplements to parents.

Read full original descriptionShow less

By experimentally studying the impacts of these income supplements on families and subsequent youth development, we can examine causal pathways from family income to risk for mental illness via family stress and neuroimmune mechanisms in ways never done before. Moreover, by measuring the longer-term impact of 3 years of income supplements to parents on their child's neuroimmune signaling and risk for mental illness, we can examine the policy implications for child development of unconditional cash transfers to parents and identify how and for whom these supplements help. We will test these basic and translational questions in a sample of 1,200 youth with lower-income parents randomly assigned to receive either a substantial monthly income supplement or a minimal monthly supplement for 3 years, starting when youth were between age 5 - 14 years old. We will follow up with youth and their parent 1 - 2 and 3 - 4 years after the intervention and examine whether income supplements predict better youth mental health during adolescence, as well as whether factors like child age and neighborhood quality modulate intervention effects. Additionally, we explore family stress mechanisms through which the intervention may impact child mental health. Finally, we will measure peripheral inflammation (inflammatory biomarkers and classical monocytes) and use MRI to assess threat, reward, and regulatory neural activity and connectivity among 500 of these youth. Our central hypothesis is that income supplements will decrease family and youth stress and improve parenting, which will improve neuroimmune signaling and decrease risk for psychopathology. Moreover, these effects will remain years after termination of the transfers and be strongest among families who received the intervention earlier in the child's life. This research will provide timely, relevant public health knowledge that will help policy makers understand the longer-term brain, immune, and mental health impacts of cash transfers to parents, while also advancing the science of the sociocontextual and neuroimmune pathways through which variability in family income impacts risk for psychopathology.

The 2 groups in the trial

  • Monetary Incentive Delay fMRI taskTreatment being tested

    fMRI task to engage cortical striatal neural circuity

    Treatment: Psychological fMRI task

  • Emotional N-back fMRI taskTreatment being tested

    fMRI task to engage working memory and socioemotional processing neural circuitry

    Treatment: Psychological fMRI task

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?

Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations

Print a page for my doctor

Data and sources

Registry record
Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Fit questions
Built from NCT07641244, who can take part
Record updated
11 June 2026