Home Monitoring Devices for People With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Tests home breathing, oxygen and weight devices in adults with fibrotic lung disease.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Remote Evaluation and Surveillance of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: Transforming ILD Care Delivery With Remote Monitoring
Key facts
- Where
- San Francisco, United StatesSee the site
Where in United States
- University of California San FranciscoSan Francisco, United StatesTaking people
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- University of California, San Francisco
- Trial code
- NCT07673237
- Record updated
- 9 October 2026
- Original description
The purpose of this interventional study is to identify which combination of remote monitoring devices (e.g. home spirometry, pulse oximetry, scale, ePROs) is the most feasible (as defined by adherence, retention, and data completeness) and acceptable when used for the detection of clinically significant Interstitial Lung Disease events.Read full original descriptionShow less
Remote Evaluation and Surveillance of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: Transforming ILD Care Delivery With Remote Monitoring
The purpose of this interventional study is to identify which combination of remote monitoring devices (e.g. home spirometry, pulse oximetry, scale, ePROs) is the most feasible (as defined by adherence, retention, and data completeness) and acceptable when used for the detection of clinically significant Interstitial Lung Disease events.
Inclusion: age 18 or older; English speaking; have a UCSF diagnosis of one of the major ILD subtypes seen in the ILD Clinic (Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, Connective-tissue disease related ILD, Sarcoidosis, Familial Fibrosis). Languages are limited to those for which both device instructional materials and user support are available (written and video). The ILD diagnosis will be based on multidisciplinary conference review, which is the diagnostic gold standard. We have restricted the ILD subtypes to those for which there is efficacy data for RPM or comparable clinical trajectories, and subtypes that account for >10% of the ILD diagnoses seen at UCSF.
Exclusion: Patients who are unable provide informed consent for any reason or are acutely ill.