Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Not yet recruitingNo phase

Comparing Suture vs. Combined Closure Strategies for Large Blood Vessel Access in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Key facts

Who runs it
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Where
Switzerland1 site in 1 countryChoose a country to see its sites
Trial code
Status
Not yet recruiting
People taking part
705 people, planned
Started
1 Oct 2026
Expected to end
Sept 2028
Type of study
Interventional, 2 groupsOne group gets an existing treatment, for comparison.
Treatments tested
  • Single Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device
  • Extravascular Collagen Plug-Based Closure Device
Record updated
4 August 2026

Who can take part

Age
18 years and older
Sex
Women and men
Healthy volunteers
Cannot take part

The registry criteria, word for word

Show all 14 criteriaShow less

Who can take part

  • Patient is at least 18 years of age at the time of screening
  • Patient is scheduled to undergo elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via transfemoral arterial access
  • Patient is deemed suitable for transfemoral TAVI and large-bore vascular access closure by the local Heart Team
  • Patient (or legally authorized representative) provides written informed consent prior to initiating any study-related procedures
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with all specified study procedures, follow-up visits, and clinical evaluations

Who cannot take part

  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial investigating cardiovascular devices or drugs that could confound study endpoints
  • Known active, unresolved local or systemic infection at the planned vascular access site
  • Known severe allergy or hypersensitivity to bovine tissue, collagen, or any component of the study closure devices (Perclose ProGlide/ProStyle or Angio-Seal) that cannot be adequately premedicated
  • Severe bleeding diathesis, active major bleeding, or absolute contraindication to standard periprocedural anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
  • Planned TAVI procedure via non-femoral arterial access (e.g., transapical, transaortic, subclavian/axillary, or carotid access)
  • Emergency or non-elective TAVI procedure
  • Target main femoral artery vessel diameter, calcification, or tortuosity judged unsuitable for standard percutaneous large-bore vascular closure device deployment
  • Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patient belongs to a vulnerable population (e.g., individuals deprived of liberty, under guardianship, or unable to give informed consent)

This trial has no sites in United States.

It has sites in one country. Choose a country to see its sites.

About the trial

What the trial wants to find out

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two strategies for closing the main artery access site in adult patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) through a blood vessel in the leg (transfemoral access).

Read full original descriptionShow less

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does using a single suture device lower the rate of access-related vascular complications compared to using a hybrid combination of a suture device and a plug-based closure device? How do the two closure strategies compare regarding bleeding complications, procedure time, and time to complete vessel sealing?

Researchers will compare a single-suture closure strategy to a hybrid closure strategy (one suture plus one plug-based device) to see if using a single suture reduces vessel-related complications and improves patient safety after TAVI.

Participants will:

Undergo standard pre-procedure screening and TAVI via the main artery in the leg as part of routine medical care.

Receive an initial single-suture placement before the large TAVI delivery system is inserted.

Be evaluated after sheath removal for initial bleeding control; qualifying participants will then be randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive no additional device (single suture group) or receive a plug-based closure device (hybrid group).

Have their heart and access site monitored during hospitalization, including laboratory checks and imaging prior to discharge.

Complete a 72-hour safety and complication evaluation.

The 2 groups in the trial

  • Single-Suture StrategyExisting treatment, for comparison

    Single suture-based vascular closure device (VCD) pre-placed prior to sheath insertion.

    Treatment: Single Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device

  • Hybrid Strategy (Suture + Plug)Treatment being tested

    Single suture-based VCD combined with an extravascular plug-based VCD (Angio-Seal®)

    Treatment: Extravascular Collagen Plug-Based Closure Device

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?

Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations

Print a page for my doctor

Data and sources

Registry record
Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Official title
SEAL-TAVI - Suture vs combinEd Closure strAtegies in Large-bore Access After TAVI
Record updated
4 August 2026