Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Not yet taking people in SwedenPhase 4

Romosozumab then denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for hip bone density in osteoporosis

Compares two osteoporosis treatments for hip bone density in postmenopausal women at high fracture risk.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Sequential Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by Denosumab vs. Zoledronic Acid for Gains in HIP BMD

Key facts

Where
Huddinge, Linköping, Malmö, Mölndal, Skövde, Stockholm, Sundsvall, Umeå, and Uppsala, SwedenSee the 9 sites
Phase
Phase 4

AI summary: who the study is looking for

From the trial's eligibility criteria. Machine-read from the registry text on this page, so it can be wrong. The registry text below and the trial team decide who can take part.

The trial is looking for postmenopausal women aged 60 or older who have osteoporosis and a high risk of broken bones. It compares two treatment plans for hip bone strength.

Age
60 years or older
Sex
Women (postmenopausal) only
Disease stage
Osteoporosis with a T-score of -2.5 or lower at the total hip or lumbar spine (L1-L4) on a DXA bone scan, and a high fracture risk (a previous low-trauma fracture after age 50, or a FRAX probability at or above the Swedish threshold). Severe osteoporosis (T-score < -3.5 and/or a grade 2 or 3 vertebral fracture) is not accepted.
Earlier treatment
Cannot have used romosozumab ever, intravenous bisphosphonate or teriparatide within 3 years, oral bisphosphonate or denosumab within 12 months, or systemic estrogen or a SERM within 3 months.
Biomarker or test result
Normal calcium, vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) of 50 nmol/L or higher, and creatinine clearance of 35 mL/min or higher before randomization.

Main reasons for not taking part

  • Previous heart attack or stroke
  • Other serious heart or circulation problems
  • Bone disease other than postmenopausal osteoporosis
  • Cancer within the last 5 years (some skin and cervical types excepted)
  • Jaw bone problems (osteonecrosis, unhealed oral lesions or active dental infection)

Read by machine on 12 November 2026.

Where in Sweden

  • Karolinska University Hospital, HuddingeHuddinge, SwedenContact: Bo Freyschuss, MD, PhDNo longer taking part
  • Linkoping University HospitalLinköping, SwedenContact: Anna Spångeus, MD, PhDNo longer taking part
  • Skåne universitetssjukhusMalmö, SwedenContact: Kristina Åkesson, MD, PhDNo longer taking part
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital MölndalMölndal, SwedenContact: Mattias Lorentzon, MD, PhDNo longer taking part
  • Skaraborgs SjukhusSkövde, SwedenContact: Eric Bertholds, MDNo longer taking part
  • Sabbatsbergs SjukhusStockholm, SwedenContact: Kristina Ekstrand, MDNo longer taking part
  • Sundsvalls SjukhusSundsvall, SwedenContact: Margareta Rödén, MDNo longer taking part
  • Norrlands universitetssjukhusUmeå, SwedenContact: Anna Ramnemark, MD, PhDNo longer taking part
  • Akademiska sjukhusetUppsala, SwedenContact: Andreas Kindmark, MD, PhDNo longer taking part

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?

Contact the study team: see the registry record → Contacts and Locations

Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Trial code
NCT07772609EU 2026-527447-18-00
Record updated
19 August 2026
Original description
Osteoporosis is associated with a high risk of fractures, disability, loss of independence, and excess mortality. Zoledronic acid is an established first-line treatment in Sweden, but many patients at high fracture risk remain at substantial residual fracture risk. Short-course treatment with romosozumab followed by denosumab produces large increases in bone mineral density, but has not been directly compared with zoledronic acid.Read full original descriptionShow less

Short-course Romosozumab Followed by Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid: A Multicentre Randomized Active-controlled Trial in Postmenopausal Women at High Fracture Risk

Osteoporosis is associated with a high risk of fractures, disability, loss of independence, and excess mortality. Zoledronic acid is an established first-line treatment in Sweden, but many patients at high fracture risk remain at substantial residual fracture risk. Short-course treatment with romosozumab followed by denosumab produces large increases in bone mineral density, but has not been directly compared with zoledronic acid.

STRONG-HIP is a multicentre, randomized, active-controlled phase 4 trial in 216 postmenopausal women aged 60 years or older with osteoporosis and high fracture risk. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive romosozumab 210 mg monthly for 3 months followed by denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, or zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously at baseline and Month 12.

The primary objective is to determine whether the romosozumab-denosumab sequence produces a greater percentage increase in total hip bone mineral density from baseline to Month 24 than zoledronic acid. Secondary outcomes include total hip and lumbar spine BMD at earlier time points, vertebral and clinical fractures, bone turnover markers, safety, health-related quality of life, and health-economic outcomes. A mechanistic substudy will assess bone microarchitecture and estimated strength using HR-pQCT.

Participants are followed for 24 months in the main study and may enter an optional extension with follow-up to Month 48 to assess the durability of treatment effects.

Inclusion: The subject is a postmenopausal woman aged 60 years or older at screening; The subject has provided written informed consent before any trial-specific procedure is performed; The subject has osteoporosis at screening defined as a T-score of -2.5 or lower at the total hip or lumbar spine (L1-L4) on central reader confirmed bone densitometry by DXA; The subject is at high fracture risk, defined by at least one of the following: a previous low-trauma fracture after age 50 years (excluding skull, face, fingers and toes); FRAX probability at or above the age-specific Swedish intervention threshold (using Nordic and Nordic borne calculations, as appropriate) in use at screening; Corrected plasma calcium or ionized calcium is within the local reference range before randomization; Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration ≥50 nmol/L before randomization; Adequate renal function for zoledronic acid treatment, defined as creatinine clearance ≥35 mL/min calculated using the clinical trial center specified calculation procedure (e.g. the Cockcroft-Gault equation) before randomization; The subject is able and willing, in the investigator's judgment, to comply with the trial procedures and attend scheduled visits; For participants entering the extension, separate written extension consent is obtained before any extension-specific procedure is performed.

Exclusion: Previous myocardial infarction or stroke at any time before screening; Transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, coronary or major peripheral revascularization within 12 months before screening, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled clinically relevant arrhythmia, or any cardiovascular condition that in the investigator's judgment confers unacceptably high risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event during study participation; Use of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or teriparatide within 3 years before randomization; Use of oral bisphosphonate or denosumab within 12 months before randomization; Any previous use of romosozumab; Use of oral glucocorticoids for more than 14 consecutive days during the 6 months before screening; Current osteonecrosis of the jaw, unhealed oral or jaw lesions, active dental or jaw infection, or planned invasive dental extraction/implant procedure that has not been completed and healed before randomization, if considered by the investigator to represent a contraindication or unacceptable risk for treatment with romosozumab, denosumab or zoledronic acid; Known metabolic bone disease other than postmenopausal osteoporosis, including but not limited to Pagets disease, osteomalacia, untreated hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, or active renal osteodystrophy; Malignancy within the last 5 years, except adequately treated basal-cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous-cell carcinoma in situ of the skin, or cervical carcinoma in situ; Any other medical, psychiatric, social or logistical condition that, in the investigators opinion, makes participation unsafe or would compromise protocol adherence or data reliability; Creatinine clearance below 35 mL/min, rapidly deteriorating renal function, or another renal condition that makes zoledronic acid unsafe; Hypocalcaemia (ionized calcium <1.15 mmol/l or total albumin corrected calcium of <2.15 mmol/l) or vitamin D 25-OH-vit-D <50nmol/l, not corrected before randomization; Unexplained serum alkaline phosphatase >2 times the local upper limit of normal; Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to romosozumab, denosumab, zoledronic acid, calcium supplementation, or vitamin D supplementation that cannot be safely managed under the protocol; Severe osteoporosis, defined as total hip or lumbar spine T-score < -3.5 and/or prevalent grade 2 or grade 3 vertebral fracture; Use of systemic estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulator within 3 months; Inability to undergo protocol DXA/VFA reliably, for example because of body habitus exceeding scanner limits, inability to position safely, or interfering hardware or artefacts that prevent valid endpoint assessment; Current participation, or recent participation within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer), in another interventional clinical trial that could affect safety or data interpretation.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07772609 · EU CTIS 2026-527447-18-00