Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
Not yet taking people in ChinaNo phase

Drug-coated balloon compared with drug-eluting stent for large artery blockages in acute coronary syndrome

Compares a drug-coated balloon with a stent in adults with acute coronary syndrome.

Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for De Novo Large Vessel Lesions in ACS

Key facts

Where
Beijing, ChinaSee the site

Where in China

  • Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.Beijing, ChinaNo longer taking part

Questions to ask the study team

  1. How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
  2. Are travel costs paid?
  3. Can I keep my own doctor?
  4. What happens if I want to stop?
Print a page for my doctor

Trial details

Who runs it
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Trial code
NCT07796412
Record updated
15 October 2026
Original description
The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB)-based strategy versus planned sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and de novo large-vessel coronary lesions. The main question is whether the SCB-based strategy is non-inferior to the SES strategy with respect to in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months. Following adequate lesion preparation and confirmation according to the prespecified angiographic and IVUS criteria that the target lesion is suitable for both randomized treatment strategies, participants will be randomly assigned to undergo either SCB treatment without routine stent implantation or planned SES implantation. In the SCB group, bail-out SES implantation will be performed when clinically necessary, such as in cases of significant residual stenosis or flow-limiting dissection. Participants will undergo angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 9 months, and clinical outcomes will be assessed through 12 months.Read full original descriptionShow less

IVUS-Guided Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for De Novo Large Vessel Lesions in ACS: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB)-based strategy versus planned sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and de novo large-vessel coronary lesions. The main question is whether the SCB-based strategy is non-inferior to the SES strategy with respect to in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months. Following adequate lesion preparation and confirmation according to the prespecified angiographic and IVUS criteria that the target lesion is suitable for both randomized treatment strategies, participants will be randomly assigned to undergo either SCB treatment without routine stent implantation or planned SES implantation. In the SCB group, bail-out SES implantation will be performed when clinically necessary, such as in cases of significant residual stenosis or flow-limiting dissection. Participants will undergo angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 9 months, and clinical outcomes will be assessed through 12 months.

Inclusion: All of the following criteria must be met:; Aged ≥18 years; Diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The diagnosis, classification, and clinical management of ACS will follow the 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. NSTEMI and STEMI will be diagnosed according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; A de novo lesion in a large native coronary artery with a target lesion reference vessel diameter ≥2.75 mm; Only one target lesion is considered to require intervention and is suitable for treatment with a sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB), with bail-out stenting if necessary, or with a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES); Successful lesion preparation according to the prespecified angiographic and IVUS criteria, confirming that the target lesion is suitable for both randomized treatment strategies; The participant has fully understood the study and provided written informed consent.

Exclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention within the previous 12 months, including stent implantation, balloon angioplasty, or SCB treatment; A concomitant condition associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year; Previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); Previous prosthetic heart valve replacement; Participation in another clinical study or clinical trial within the previous 12 months; Acute heart failure, acute cardiogenic shock, or persistent hemodynamic instability; A left main coronary artery target lesion or severe left main coronary artery disease requiring simultaneous treatment; A bypass graft lesion or myocardial bridging involving the target lesion; Severe hepatic or renal impairment; Unsuitable for percutaneous coronary intervention or long-term antithrombotic therapy, including:; Known contraindication to aspirin, heparin, antiplatelet agents, or contrast media; A history of intracranial hemorrhage. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planned pregnancy during the study period; Known severe hypersensitivity to sirolimus or its derivatives, any component of the study devices-including the SES polymer or metal-or contrast media; or inability or unwillingness to undergo repeat coronary angiography and IVUS at 9 months for any other reason; Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:; A bifurcation lesion requiring simultaneous intervention of both the main vessel and side branch; In-stent restenosis in the target vessel; only de novo lesions are eligible for this study; Lesion anatomy unsuitable for SCB treatment or conventional SES implantation, including:; Lesion length >40 mm; Chronic total occlusion (CTO); Severe calcification expected to preclude satisfactory lesion preparation; Severe vessel tortuosity or angulation >90° that may prevent safe device delivery; Considered unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator because of anticipated nonadherence or any other reason.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07796412