Comparing Two Eye Surgeries for People With Glaucoma
Compares trabeculectomy with Preserflo MicroShunt surgery in people with glaucoma.
Plain-language title generated from the registry record
Registry title: Trabeculectomy Versus MicroShunt Implantation in Glaucoma Surgery (TIGER)
Key facts
- Where
- Oslo, NorwaySee the site
Where in Norway
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of OsloOslo, NorwayNo longer taking part
Questions to ask the study team
- How often do I need to come in, and for how long each time?
- Are travel costs paid?
- Can I keep my own doctor?
- What happens if I want to stop?
Trial details
- Who runs it
- Oslo University Hospital
- Trial code
- NCT07869108
- Record updated
- 9 October 2026
- Original description
Glaucoma is an eye disease causing vision loss if not treated adequately. The prevalence is around 1.5%, exponentially increasing to more than 10% in the elderly. Trabeculectomy has been the gold standard surgery for decades and is an evidence based choice for glaucoma surgery. In the last years, new operation methods with shunts or stents (MIGS) have been introduced, however, the scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of these new methods are scarce and the cost is considerable. Nevertheless, the use has increased, likely due to a shorter learning curve for surgery. The aim of the present project is to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing trabeculectomy versus Preserflo MicroShunt surgery in patients with glaucoma, and to compare the efficacy (intraocular pressure reduction), the safety (in terms of complication rate) and cost-efficiency. The project targets a large patient group and a considerable resource use in Norwegian opthalmology departments.Read full original descriptionShow less
Trabeculectomy Versus MicroShunt Implantation in Glaucoma Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial (TIGER)
Glaucoma is an eye disease causing vision loss if not treated adequately. The prevalence is around 1.5%, exponentially increasing to more than 10% in the elderly. Trabeculectomy has been the gold standard surgery for decades and is an evidence based choice for glaucoma surgery. In the last years, new operation methods with shunts or stents (MIGS) have been introduced, however, the scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of these new methods are scarce and the cost is considerable. Nevertheless, the use has increased, likely due to a shorter learning curve for surgery. The aim of the present project is to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing trabeculectomy versus Preserflo MicroShunt surgery in patients with glaucoma, and to compare the efficacy (intraocular pressure reduction), the safety (in terms of complication rate) and cost-efficiency. The project targets a large patient group and a considerable resource use in Norwegian opthalmology departments.
Main aim: to optimize treatment in glaucoma patients by evaluating surgical treatment strategies and guidelines. Objectives: to compare trabeculectomy (gold standard) versus Preserflo microshunt implantation (less invasive surgery) in glaucoma patients in a randomized trial comparing several parameters such as intraocular pressure, number of glaucoma medications, vision and the safety (including complications, corneal endothalial cell loss and need for re-operations) between these two groups.
Inclusion: Primary filtering surgery in the given eye; Ability to cooperate fairly well; Willingness to participate.
Exclusion: Previous filtering surgery in the same eye; Low target IOP; Corneal decompensation; Juvenile glaucoma.