Under construction – not a live service
Sign in
CompletedNo phase

Safety & Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System-Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Significant Comorbidities in Extreme Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement

Key facts

Where
Ann Arbor, Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Burlington, Cleveland, Columbus, Dallas, Danville, Des Moines, Detroit, Durham, Falls Church, Grand Rapids, Hartford, Houma, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Los Angeles, Manhasset, Maywood, Miami, Miami Beach, Milwaukee, Morristown, Nashville, New Haven, New York, Palo Alto, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Roslyn, Washington D.C., Winston-Salem, and Wormleysburg, United StatesSee the 43 sites

Where in United States

  • University of Michigan Health SystemsAnn Arbor, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Piedmont Heart InstituteAtlanta, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Saint Joseph's Hospital of AtlantaAtlanta, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • The Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimore, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBoston, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • University of Vermont Medical CenterBurlington, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • University Hospitals Case Medical CenterCleveland, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Riverside Methodist HospitalColumbus, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • The Ohio State University Medical Center - The Richard M. Ross Heart HospitalColumbus, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Baylor Heart and Vascular HospitalDallas, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Geisinger Medical CenterDanville, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Iowa Heart CenterDes Moines, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Detroit Medical Center Cardiovascular InstituteDetroit, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • St John Hospital and Medical CenterDetroit, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Duke University Medical CenterDurham, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Inova Fairfax HospitalFalls Church, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Spectrum Health HospitalsGrand Rapids, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Hartford HospitalHartford, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South/Terrebonne GeneralHouma, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalHouston, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • The Methodist Hospital - The Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular CenterHouston, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • St. Vincent Heart Center of IndianaIndianapolis, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • University of Kansas HospitalKansas City, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical CenterLos Angeles, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • University of Southern California University HospitalLos Angeles, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • North Shore University HospitalManhasset, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Loyola University Medical CenterMaywood, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • University of Miami Health System, Jackson Memorial HospitalMiami, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Mount Sinai Medical CenterMiami Beach, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • St. Luke's Medical Center - Aurora Health CareMilwaukee, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Morristown Memorial HospitalMorristown, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Yale New Haven HospitalNew Haven, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Lenox Hill HospitalNew York, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • NYU Langone Medical CenterNew York, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • The Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew York, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemPalo Alto, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Banner Good SamaritanPhoenix, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburgh, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • St. Francis HospitalRoslyn, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Washington Hospital Center / Georgetown HospitalWashington D.C., United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical CenterWinston-Salem, United StatesNo longer taking part
  • Pinnacle HealthWormleysburg, United StatesNo longer taking part

Trial details

Who runs it
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Trial code
NCT01675440
Record updated
5 May 2026
Original description
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic CoreValve® System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with significant comorbidities in whom the risk of surgical aortic valve replacement has a predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk of ≥50% at 30 days.Read full original descriptionShow less

Medtronic CoreValve® U.S. Expanded Use Study

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic CoreValve® System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with significant comorbidities in whom the risk of surgical aortic valve replacement has a predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk of ≥50% at 30 days.

Inclusion: Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and two cardiac surgeons agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Specifically, the predicted operative risk of death or serious, irreversible morbidity is ≥ 50% at 30 days; Subjects must meet all of the criteria under at least one of the sub-groups 2a-c:; Senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis and i. At least one of the following co-morbid conditions:; Severe (≥3-4+) mitral valve regurgitation as measured by echocardiography; Severe (≥3-4+) tricuspid valve regurgitation as measured by echocardiography; End-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy (Stage 5 of the KDOQI CKD Classification) or creatinine clearance <20cc/min but not requiring renal replacement therapy; AND; mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/sec by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram (if the LVEF < 50%), or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization either resting or with dobutamine stress (if the LVEF < 50%) AND iii. an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm2 (or aortic valve area index ≤0.5 cm2/m2) by resting echocardiogram or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization; AND/OR; Low gradient, low output aortic stenosis as defined by the presence of all three of the following i. In the presence of LVEF <50%, absence of contractile reserve, a mean gradient ≥25mmHg and <40mmHg AND jet velocity less than 4.0m/sec with dobutamine stress echocardiography or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization OR In the presence of LVEF ≥50%, a mean gradient ≥25mmHg and <40mmHg AND jet velocity less than 4.0 m/sec, by echocardiography or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization AND ii. an initial aortic valve area of ≤0.8 cm2 (or aortic valve area index ≤0.5 cm2/m2) by resting echocardiogram or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization AND iii. radiographic evidence of severe aortic valve calcification AND/OR c. Failed bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve; Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater; The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the IRB of the respective clinical site; The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.

Exclusion: Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤30 days before the MCS TAVI procedure; Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the MCS TAVI procedure; Need for emergency surgery for any reason; Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study; Surgical bioprosthetic annulus <17mm or >29mm i. Stented SAV per the manufactured labeled inner diameter OR ii. Stentless SAV per the baseline diagnostic imaging; Ascending aorta that exceeds the maximum diameter for any given native or surgical bioprosthetic* aortic annulus size (see table below) Aortic Annulus Diameter/ Ascending Aorta Diameter, 18 mm* - 20 mm/ >34 mm, 20 mm - 23 mm/ >40 mm, 23 mm - 27 mm/ >43 mm, 27 mm - 29 mm/ >43 mm,; 17mm for surgical bioprosthetic aortic annulus; Degenerated surgical bioprothesis presents with a significant concomitant perivalvular leak (between prothesis and native annulus), is not securely fixed in the native annulus, or is not structurally intact (e.g. wireform frame fracture) (ONLY FOR TAV in SAV subjects); Degenerated surgical bioprothesis presents with a partially detached leaflet that in the aortic position may obstruct a coronary ostium (ONLY FOR TAV in SAV subjects); Vascular; Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization; Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support; Active Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation; A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimens (including ability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), nitinol, or [allergic] sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated; Life expectancy <12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions; Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of an Investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent; Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits); Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease; Anatomical; Subject has a:; Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic heart valve with a rigid support structure in either the mitral or pulmonic position:; that could affect the implantation or function of the study valve OR; the implantation of the study valve could affect the function of the pre-existing prosthetic heart valve; Mixed aortic valve disease: aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation, (AR is moderate-severe to severe (≥3-4+))(except for failed surgical bioprothesis); Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC <1000mm3), thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy; Severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <20% as measured by resting echocardiogram; Clinical; Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA); Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis; Subject refuses a blood transfusion; Native aortic annulus size <18 mm or >29 mm per the baseline diagnostic imaging (not applicable for TAV in SAV subjects) OR; Moderate to severe mitral stenosis; Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; Echocardiographic evidence of new or untreated intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation; Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient; Aortic root angulation (angle between plane of aortic valve annulus and horizontal plane/vertebrae) >70° (for femoral and left subclavian/axillary access) and >30° (for right subclavian/axillary access); Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography (Not applicable for TAV in SAV subjects); Sinus of valsalva anatomy that would prevent adequate coronary perfusion; Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01675440